DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	 Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>,
	 "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Use correct memory ordering in eal functions
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:23:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8z6LUSW4EOaeQiJz4z_fOhMu9MWdaUH46hdGC0R_+oNWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211025045237.19878-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 6:53 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli
<honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote:
>
> v3:
> a) Added Fixes, Cc:stable#dpdk.org in 1/6
> b) Merged 3/6 & 4/6 and moved after the first commit in the series
> c) Merged 2/6 & 5/6 as they need to be in a single commit
> d) Removed use of volatile in 6/6 (Konstantin)
>
> rte_eal_remote_launch and rte_eal_wait_lcore need to provide
> correct memory ordering to address the data communication from
> main core to worker core.
>
> There are 2 use cases:
> 1) All the store operations (meant for worker) by main core
> should be visible to worker core before the worker core runs the
> assigned function
>
> 2) All the store operations by the worker core should be visible
> to the main core after rte_eal_wait_lcore returns.
>
> For the data that needs to be communicated to the worker after
> the rte_eal_remote_launch returns, load-acquire and store-release
> semantics should be used.
>
> For the main to worker communication, the pointer to function
> to execute is used as the guard variable. Hence, resetting of
> the function pointer is important.
>
> For the worker to main communication, the existing code uses the
> lcore state as the guard variable. However, it looks like
> the FINISHED state is not really required. Hence the FINISHED state
> is removed before using the state as the guard variable.
>
> Honnappa Nagarahalli (4):
>   eal: reset lcore function pointer and argument
>   eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required
>   eal: ensure correct memory ordering
>   test/ring: use relaxed barriers for ring stress test
>
>  app/test/test_ring_stress_impl.h              | 18 +++----
>  drivers/event/dpaa2/dpaa2_eventdev_selftest.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/event/octeontx/ssovf_evdev_selftest.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/event/sw/sw_evdev_selftest.c          |  4 +-
>  examples/l2fwd-keepalive/main.c               |  3 +-
>  lib/eal/common/eal_common_launch.c            | 13 ++---
>  lib/eal/freebsd/eal_thread.c                  | 45 +++++++++++++----
>  lib/eal/include/rte_launch.h                  | 21 ++++----
>  lib/eal/include/rte_service.h                 |  4 +-
>  lib/eal/linux/eal_thread.c                    | 48 +++++++++++++------
>  lib/eal/windows/eal_thread.c                  | 48 +++++++++++++------
>  11 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)

Tweaked commit titles, removed deprecation notice and updated release
notes in patch 2.
Series applied, thanks.


-- 
David Marchand


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-25 16:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-24 21:20 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/5] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-02-24 21:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/5] eal: reset lcore function pointer and argument Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-02-24 21:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/5] eal: ensure memory operations are visible to worker Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-02-24 21:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/5] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required Honnappa Nagarahalli
     [not found]   ` <AM5PR0802MB2465B62994239817E0AC46C59E9E9@AM5PR0802MB2465.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
2021-02-25  8:44     ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-02-25 23:33       ` [dpdk-dev] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-02-26  8:26         ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-03-02  3:13           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-03-19 13:42             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-03-30  2:54               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-03-01  5:55         ` [dpdk-dev] 回复: " Feifei Wang
2021-02-24 21:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 4/5] eal: ensure memory operations are visible to main Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-02-24 21:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 5/5] test/ring: use relaxed barriers for ring stress test Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-03-01 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/5] Use correct memory ordering in eal functions Stephen Hemminger
2021-03-02 16:06   ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] " Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] eal: reset lcore function pointer and argument Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-10  7:49     ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-10  8:12       ` David Marchand
2021-09-11 22:19         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] eal: ensure memory operations are visible to worker Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] eal: update rte_eal_wait_lcore definition Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:37     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] eal: ensure memory operations are visible to main Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-09-09 23:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] test/ring: use relaxed barriers for ring stress test Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-07 11:55     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2021-10-07 23:40       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25  4:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Use correct memory ordering in eal functions Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] eal: reset lcore function pointer and argument Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] eal: lcore state FINISHED is not required Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] eal: use correct memory ordering Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25  4:52   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] test/ring: use relaxed barriers for ring stress test Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-10-25 16:23   ` David Marchand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8z6LUSW4EOaeQiJz4z_fOhMu9MWdaUH46hdGC0R_+oNWw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=feifei.wang2@arm.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).