From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3754A0561; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 18:53:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7811D6BB; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 18:53:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311391D154 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 18:53:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587401597; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dh3r6c6WXwkyAd01Dh1WqCDxsTH4vIDkk7f5rF2eX6Q=; b=E2hgiPSJzJArO3xtPkMRc0zVQMAgskT+7zoHp6TAlxwjQhqlTsFdu+/UNSqDUNYfU9wB5i 7k4mRg704th+ACulnWooL2mBzr5QEEixg6VfgkRgRrS/MSl2/UJGih3GPl3E+aITtphdmb pK81TnNjNISPD1bMyTzILjB0udpibCI= Received: from mail-vs1-f71.google.com (mail-vs1-f71.google.com [209.85.217.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-7-ok-XZtvNNCiQir2R1gDOtg-1; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:53:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ok-XZtvNNCiQir2R1gDOtg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f71.google.com with SMTP id a22so1895785vsl.18 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:53:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UJC93w8zlX+OU3aLXQE0291r7Zt7i/d21bKSKMJRtw0=; b=OKXEiM1nAyx3vqIt3FV0gPfdGG8uxX/rabp5NuaYJ4661XIa1djfuwEucAKTHV7C93 qp0p1hhtzCW9XN7+ccXqm7k+uGX7sHGLFTOy9f5YX3lND/MMej57YVtGZIkvr/2fiib+ FwzfMwgALjeXNVP+mwkI7spYN3AyKukYjGY9MXCpk0n493cA/d1bBvjYeYJUs27MqrbC kaN57etRYkEzTGkkCFYlv0paNgcBVBmFAvIPFCLZgRb41OlQ8eWzYqdD19lca0+7hP45 b7QepHDw9ZVzeZjU4kgxYxaygcLXSzZh7hWy2CPA450ey8JX63Cj3TOC9wWxMQXQDzRl NymA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZBADsPP5M6dmUVThLxPvnpQUBymh9JTqLY5CqxoWOikXJZUJJS Xn3+avVv2Rhmvld90pVn6mDyRdv/pA3Rr7s1VJgteLdPbRG8p3hK88SwtS8FAceEUmKxuPbmjEB ukz4pylH5Z888/TCGt5k= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:1043:: with SMTP id h3mr12595550vsq.39.1587401593055; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:53:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJgKf7mhcouyUeybtH4IFWmt0QcgkOh3dD5M81kU3/10p8XxTb5gN4DXcE4npuLvoVFfQLzJ+GRKceOnHN+uug= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:1043:: with SMTP id h3mr12595528vsq.39.1587401592738; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 09:53:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200305043311.17065-1-vattunuru@marvell.com> <20200418173035.8000-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200418173035.8000-1-haiyue.wang@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 18:53:01 +0200 Message-ID: To: Haiyue Wang Cc: dev , "Burakov, Anatoly" , Thomas Monjalon , Vamsi Attunuru , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Alex Williamson X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/2] support for VFIO-PCI VF token interface X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello, On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 7:36 PM Haiyue Wang wrote: > > v8: Update the document. Thanks for the last version. I had a look at the CI, I can see we are still missing bits to handle the ABI failure on rte_vfio_setup_device. --=20 David Marchand