DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] version: 20.05-rc0
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 12:23:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zAtKMrQ9GJe1UZp=P4w6N4tRM1-M+WPVP6GKFvfSTTMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200227111718.GA1587@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:17 PM Bruce Richardson
<bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 03:01:04PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 2:55 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > 26/02/2020 14:38, David Marchand:
> > > > Start a new release cycle with empty release notes.
> > > > ABI must now be checked with v20.02 as a reference.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .travis.yml                            |   4 +
> > > >  ABI_VERSION                            |   2 +-
> > > >  VERSION                                |   2 +-
> > > >  doc/guides/rel_notes/index.rst         |   1 +
> > > >  doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_05.rst | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  5 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >  create mode 100644 doc/guides/rel_notes/release_20_05.rst
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > >
> > >
> > > > --- a/.travis.yml
> > > > +++ b/.travis.yml
> > > > +env:
> > > > +  global:
> > > > +    - REF_GIT_TAG=v20.02
> > >
> > > One question: why REF_GIT_TAG was not needed in Travis during 20.02?
> >
> > The .ci/linux-build.sh script has a default value for parameters.
> > http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/.ci/linux-build.sh#n71&h=v20.02
> >
> > This could be removed, so that we only have explicit values in the
> > .travis.yml configuration.
> > No strong opinion keeping them.
> >
> Why do we need to update the git ref tag at all. Since these releases are
> all ABI compatible with each other, can we not leave the checks still to be
> against 19.11?

Checking only with 19.11 (major abi) would not detected breakage
between minor versions.
Like the meter symbols that entered the 20.0.1 version.


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-27 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-26 13:38 David Marchand
2020-02-26 13:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-26 14:01   ` David Marchand
2020-02-27 11:17     ` Bruce Richardson
2020-02-27 11:23       ` David Marchand [this message]
2020-02-27 11:26         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-27 11:01   ` David Marchand
2020-02-27 11:31     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8zAtKMrQ9GJe1UZp=P4w6N4tRM1-M+WPVP6GKFvfSTTMQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).