From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B939A0547; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:49:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B412841158; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:49:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DFE40040 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:49:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1624279761; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YscySy+b9okUxlkz599HMhFHgHD6fvAvzq3DnK0owGs=; b=eqJn4tw/49Qkqkd+XrUTGirV1J39zDI+rbLh4fn06OdkPsiZl9/TChv/PbEeisSCsakkHj QtklvuNFpcIa3foyclQkmlpQQ58zV7LBFpOHpsf1ricHVqFXCEB4lmuG53A1lfHrZ2qUHy yriVgm0PmsbD2WYTQM7HCs9lFPW3isA= Received: from mail-vs1-f69.google.com (mail-vs1-f69.google.com [209.85.217.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-514-G288b_iZOOSSmvv0b2eSww-1; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 08:49:20 -0400 X-MC-Unique: G288b_iZOOSSmvv0b2eSww-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f69.google.com with SMTP id j139-20020a6787910000b0290271e919035dso3540649vsd.13 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 05:49:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YscySy+b9okUxlkz599HMhFHgHD6fvAvzq3DnK0owGs=; b=ElRar3oC3dsNzL8zk2FHMTDRU2iSo/NbhFIGtEA/Bp1/S+NOTuX2dpj25EvW6+LEZM tQMpnvTM38C60mNQe+LiUyuLmybRQUT5HOFcSL283/EsBg0bHGBKMDewetAqCXQCNwYl M6CeayU4NRlAvrxQcfmtg9nfUVlC78XpQoKLOVisd/ww4JFRRoMQXFe3JlLDbd0R+Zi7 7o/oqwBAmjEQ3niJY6F/7p/+A2KvXlQlU3ZaJ3+WAybN2MnUHLcbFYyk+7tKZa50bUI5 XR/uT68CKsOxZwg3XSkBolHsG6vsNNoj1TsBDAlCaYgBhpGVMHxQqj58d4CUeRFzV1qn gwQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531O0BxznpVXKlP4OPWZR09gODLyjlGxKNA5GlePsQxpIRE7uYIf /8OcbgBmnbPSIaKzbPlPqRv1cqW+cvDp95eaTHDDF634B4HOeimd1QjGd3OvtdDpb/+n2FYMFpV /ut4KV7K/IuoGRo/263U= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c513:: with SMTP id e19mr13311061vsk.18.1624279759906; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 05:49:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyO0ZXLo3rcTo6e5AI8AC0hO1g+/EM/02KC1gR6UUmrfRvGOdBqE01U14vrquotlcbQE6w4yb/dzVATB0bjA2U= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c513:: with SMTP id e19mr13311044vsk.18.1624279759702; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 05:49:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210326163732.763862-1-lance.richardson@broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 14:49:08 +0200 Message-ID: To: Lance Richardson Cc: Declan Doherty , Pablo de Lara , Chas Williams , "humin (Q)" , dev , dpdk stable Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] app/test: fix IPv6 header initialization X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 2:41 PM Lance Richardson wrote: > > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:42 AM Lance Richardson > wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:31 AM David Marchand > > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 5:37 PM Lance Richardson > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Fix two issues found when writing PMD unit tests for HW ptype and > > > > L4 checksum offload: > > > > > > Would those unit tests be interesting to other pmd driver writers? > > > > > I think so, although some adjustments would be needed to account > > for differences in hardware capabilities. The tests I've written so far > > are still very much a work in progress, but I hope to have something > > ready for RFC in the near future. > > What is the current status of this patch? I wanted feedback from bonding guys, but I'll get it in v21.08 now. Thanks for the heads up. -- David Marchand