From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15ED3A0526; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:59:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA831D643; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:59:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4046E1D5BB for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:59:29 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1594216768; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SZFiaY2ujgfjsWWWwT35RpCfliIhfAJ4NtPUDuDGdWE=; b=FwvPNMCEH3jJRPFVfb5Or9TvMzAG9EWxzBr3Nfp5yVDQEgWLYuthN2ywp8aNEiCNfpMHiI Xxq+Wf6wkum6+PD4dygYyg1UWDdq3LZlt+FIKK/06A8qkKX0z1l4uUCvlGHXKTRYzl7Fki B87YtulETaVGssNVodgPOC3wcLES0PE= Received: from mail-ua1-f71.google.com (mail-ua1-f71.google.com [209.85.222.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-497-ZZF4kUhfNNm_ZlPXK6pvYg-1; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:59:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ZZF4kUhfNNm_ZlPXK6pvYg-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f71.google.com with SMTP id q3so15971062uas.12 for ; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 06:59:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SZFiaY2ujgfjsWWWwT35RpCfliIhfAJ4NtPUDuDGdWE=; b=QlEEeyfCcTC+tDbMnCMeGG+rVhf3cqEFHKWmLe4AeOKiPyQpEAgitndRA7TwS2HGHD P55jZIOll9xgpfgBV7w0G7L6pq9KcBSRQlJ2Vj/QB5rsT8oKNycLJgQ742GsuXaNFOEa 6/ZCtiei2Jo7XLSx6gVqsANJWV/SL6f6QIO39GvmtFoEGx7kJ/YLzxYVJbecV/KPSt3g D/9HrekdC3cPwxmMqgVW0oYsnTVdxsS/2b3uFzvgSS2Ta+9jO1aFjIf/rQvBGh7aMOad val8gFku740HfXiVZn1+NhIK0862H7Qbq4kHfP0JZO9W5vhBS0b1s6uTQFKTYJzrgYEU nETw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533J5iUPU6h5QkEgkB8TncyBhkCUssTs9uYqfp/4+YMN9mgSFCpQ vTtqIEpkjj/qs6SqVIDwpau3EdGZ3Y22luiEjHe83vYXbT3/VBB2S0KNVlbmI3dIUEGQihMQCsM usD4MdgS5SqqxsupqLzE= X-Received: by 2002:a67:26c2:: with SMTP id m185mr41910160vsm.39.1594216764665; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 06:59:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNEfc8nftD/yVd4jF24CTqqI3bUkJyiVo6CCCI2eby+Mryg2q+xjLlr+iQNJHAnBdlSMPb1Y/IXy1Rq9KTKmg= X-Received: by 2002:a67:26c2:: with SMTP id m185mr41910133vsm.39.1594216764391; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 06:59:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1591871065-12461-1-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> <1591871065-12461-2-git-send-email-phil.yang@arm.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 15:59:12 +0200 Message-ID: To: Aaron Conole Cc: Phil Yang , dev , David Christensen , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , nd , Dodji Seketeli , Neil Horman , Ray Kinsella , Harman Kalra Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: use c11 atomics for interrupt status X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 3:43 PM Aaron Conole wrote: > > Note: checking on the test-report ml, I saw nothing, but ovsrobot did > > catch the issue with this change too, Aaron? > > I don't have archives back to Jun 11 on the robot server. I think it > doesn't preserve forever (and the archives seem to go back only until > Jul 03). I will update it. > > I do see that we have a failed travis job: > > https://travis-ci.org/github/ovsrobot/dpdk/builds/697180855 > > I'm surprised this didn't go out. Have we seen other failures to report > of the ovs robot recently? I can double check the job config. > We do receive reports from the robot atm. And I found one failure reported this morning. http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2020-July/142421.html Maybe transient failures wrt mail delivery? Just throwing an idea.. -- David Marchand