From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE337A04F3; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 15:22:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1D91DA1B; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 15:22:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7181D9F2 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2020 15:22:56 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1578493375; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Sx0fuxJPPNCVI11ZUJlNytF3DjzEU7X0EAbdiVKYZ4Q=; b=aX+E9iClNq30TV8KEL96zvvsWaOeGdxI4isG0Py22kdWDfupRIyUT2pr13V4sNd3cq/nBj f2T6r2HnyWwBPeSe+ztFjd/1h+MzNJBGSbwK5y1EIhDgxOUAr1Bu2dQVw8ETNOz79hz+Og fnraUT3tA23Tcduqf+YHJo2JOOFAlk4= Received: from mail-vk1-f198.google.com (mail-vk1-f198.google.com [209.85.221.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-51-H4a2pJ9nMGSnLREwBmUKDw-1; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 09:22:53 -0500 Received: by mail-vk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id c1so1155862vko.4 for ; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 06:22:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5gCvC/Fie+mxjzh0eWksS5DDw3GJKxGFqTiHAOu8/ew=; b=MQFtQDeK+CKNwNYGb5YQemdxn/vVcsafb7Y0ipuEoAItVHt5u0DPVhuNhvPSkuY7Wv VtLW8iQYSJwmM2XcdwDySndSikxEGXLGpFk6ARYNofZFjoW6IQuvPmXm0xK/qYcQ+TCD pnAkbPDK6NBZs1B4r4ywwghQ6W3GTMzsgdoqCNMdbOSMvdDKgLFOKpPec1SguREoSKWZ 2zXYNeS5crvcOUCMOgPNmO2xoMnWIV+AKjgdgeyjMWMp4AK9dTRMegG20qFLfOzgQ9qN nnNHo96M8JopqLhK63rY4tuAbWW4pAcr3lKxYep/0VL5F6kBPNDw9qw3kyYfZcV8NIot gFSg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUirByiZL5dE4zKi0PxCkApUeDaivwpwPmdVGaTK0BBb8RwZQiU +Mkft1cSvMrhlMh20EjGHiKq1ZXVD8GIEfzd1M6lvVZE3NZe5oFZOKvc8ar59Ff8heCdKvEOdlk 7M+snlTV8rCBHKU3HOK4= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:fe4e:: with SMTP id l75mr3154864vki.18.1578493373005; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 06:22:53 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwkcfe8CyQnfiXMVBWHojCn5+lPtxO4AdPyZyhVhJviersxNeRWLiyppjovq+hIov21CLbQLJ75DWSc/CBMjbw= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:fe4e:: with SMTP id l75mr3154834vki.18.1578493372569; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 06:22:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200108110251.20916-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <8a5bc72da0875617a690d6a95d310974413f46da.camel@debian.org> <20200108121011.GA235@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20200108121011.GA235@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 15:22:41 +0100 Message-ID: To: Bruce Richardson Cc: Luca Boccassi , dev , Aaron Conole , Michael Santana , Thomas Monjalon X-MC-Unique: H4a2pJ9nMGSnLREwBmUKDw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: pin meson to 0.52.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 1:10 PM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 12:59:35PM +0100, David Marchand wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:29 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2020-01-08 at 12:02 +0100, David Marchand wrote: > > > > meson 0.53.0 has a compatibility issue [1] with the python 3.5.2 th= at > > > > comes > > > > in Ubuntu 16.04. > > > > Let's pin meson to 0.52.0 while the fix is being prepared in meson. > > > > > > > > 1: > > > > https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/issues/6427 > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand < > > > > david.marchand@redhat.com > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > .ci/linux-setup.sh | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > Acked-by: Luca Boccassi > > > > There is a 0.52.1 version available, so I suppose we can blacklist > > meson < 0.53 instead. > > Thought? > > > > If noone objects, I will apply a fix by the end of the day. > > > Wondering if there is value in using 0.47.1, the minimum version we > support, to catch potential issues with someone using features from newer > versions? I suspect there are more people using the latest releases of > meson than the baseline supported version? Testing with a fixed version seems better in a CI, and since we announce this minimum version, then yes, it makes sense. I will post a v2. --=20 David Marchand