From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3A346F4A; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:56:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB42C40653; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:56:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8ADF4060A for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:56:40 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1758527800; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lz93Aua4s7/nsjXeBd+kAhCX3QxL/zbecciB1/b1rhI=; b=Ba48jOmGWbUdqcyRPXQp+v6kbG/QgxzptQV2jNycoD2S5apQHvK5nTeQYIcqZVGduSxtG8 6FgnHbmUR3w7aR+5hwYISW95YlWqFS+QQKeENUZ+WruzzzGZe/uK2qysdNZ+ENiLfwkSY1 Z3R1gX8cJcziOBVW/M4ROcaHMYkFCGw= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-635-6I9uIha4MeWcRGkhAllw-A-1; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 03:56:36 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6I9uIha4MeWcRGkhAllw-A-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: 6I9uIha4MeWcRGkhAllw-A_1758527795 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-333f903e1cfso15262161fa.2 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:56:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758527795; x=1759132595; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=lz93Aua4s7/nsjXeBd+kAhCX3QxL/zbecciB1/b1rhI=; b=ia4IGYPycMJMhaKDWPtXc6s+FJu4cjvCVddOH0ncYvQJYOsE9lT9F2SD2lDJMQDNep LVXOqVBWcYhvnx6tIiQRRnp9J0KSDc9yvRkxYFnamVwLD4c9Dnfv56HNi9aRolbxEVQl kMBrgyQ0vIVd5XM/2W0agNxJO++1byYqIp8iTTmau5bLnWdS1HFVPcecA7e2dK6Qq120 ZOxYf1lxYyGytJtQENdUK9GGWNq834/3ndax2jC37oWkiJRpHK7VstIOet5mfHtqi7MU 2+u32CSaFtoHa2X6STfxLRNOCQAiK9DUuU37sP/Dr2X3w5SzEO9Zk/Z0K464NKIATezs AJfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YypvGNTw6i1OqCv6fe6r2SkkzKMBO+SAUxPkOaol0yPwMyoYRVk TJQXTOVF+p8tBWsg+Df6KXe+X7+ttgqbiYmw4D+/3TkTedAUpyaatu699i70rUBmWYwQUITvE3f TBDmMdTh6T3HF27yp5kKZ+VSHYH+QfdTejBJ7ZmPKbhveIJSRG4XRU2jcLR7AQc9g6cPoMO0Lr4 fTxK3JcohIL4qN4ORWsAo= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsarQuWvul2H0mbSQA1lA0tpCE84/pNWm1q+Ae+6mzI28J/5TWu7WXeZtXHsnL q2wBDQtBErvuoiQTF3fs59Q+Anp4tygXA+gbdWHNaw6QKyvQgnMkmGp3mih1DqxUvGkh0UG6qn/ DVt55GeV2/XWRPWMoo3Hzl7es= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3c93:b0:569:a257:acca with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-579e1f412famr4374871e87.32.1758527794945; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:56:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF0JmcCr00QtHEF/fO3bG3NFyXl4Rxgs8lMa++/BAUzTJ6I3HzOQfBmpmO4hzjjRFEbL84kTZ+IMUKqZbt0c8I= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3c93:b0:569:a257:acca with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-579e1f412famr4374868e87.32.1758527794495; Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:56:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250825092719.882769-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20250825092719.882769-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 09:56:22 +0200 X-Gm-Features: AS18NWCkLV9rtUTWdTc1NelAIlNrbUneil7U_RagQe3CVEN6zTn6RxCsZ9DOEas Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/bnxt: remove dead code under DPDK version check To: Ajit Khaparde Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Somnath Kotur , Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Monjalon X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: bZ8aHXWoCOd2dLrK2Rd55NH2TSW2FcNjLII1wlRnI3E_1758527795 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hello Ajit, On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 at 11:28, David Marchand wrote: > > There is no good reason to keep code for older versions of DPDK in the > main branch. > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand Can you merge this cleanup? I also see another patch waiting for review/merge: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20250521193727.382342-1-stephen@networkplumber.org/ Thanks. -- David Marchand