DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Dodji Seketeli <dodji@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, kirankumark@marvell.com,
	 ndabilpuram@marvell.com, yanzhirun_163@163.com,
	 Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] graph: mcore: optimize graph search
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:49:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zFF17ce4sK4zBWE9dRTPFwQ-0v_JRG-g8XqfEuFVJOBw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241216014353.2036-1-chcchc88@163.com>

Salut Dodji,

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 2:44 AM Huichao Cai <chcchc88@163.com> wrote:
> diff --git a/devtools/libabigail.abignore b/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> index 21b8cd6113..a92ee29512 100644
> --- a/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> +++ b/devtools/libabigail.abignore
> @@ -33,3 +33,8 @@
>  ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
>  ; Temporary exceptions till next major ABI version ;
>  ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
> +[suppress_type]
> +       name = rte_node
> +       has_size_change = no
> +       has_data_member_inserted_between =
> +{offset_of(total_sched_fail), offset_of(xstat_off)}

Here is a suppression rule I suggested but does not have the intended effect.

For the context:

Before the change (that you can find below with the next hunk), we
made sure to zero the whole rte_node object at runtime in the library
allocator.
And the offset of the field next to 'dispatch' is fixed with an
explicit alignas() statement.

        /** Fast schedule area for mcore dispatch model. */
        union {
                alignas(RTE_CACHE_LINE_MIN_SIZE) struct {
                        unsigned int lcore_id;  /**< Node running
lcore. */
                        uint64_t total_sched_objs; /**< Number of
objects scheduled. */
                        uint64_t total_sched_fail; /**< Number of
scheduled failure. */
                } dispatch;
        };

        /** Fast path area cache line 1. */
        alignas(RTE_CACHE_LINE_MIN_SIZE)
        rte_graph_off_t xstat_off; /**< Offset to xstat counters. */

If you want the whole definition, you can have a look at:
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tree/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h#n87

[...]

> diff --git a/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h b/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h
> index d3ec88519d..aef0f65673 100644
> --- a/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h
> +++ b/lib/graph/rte_graph_worker_common.h
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ struct __rte_cache_aligned rte_node {
>                         unsigned int lcore_id;  /**< Node running lcore. */
>                         uint64_t total_sched_objs; /**< Number of objects scheduled. */
>                         uint64_t total_sched_fail; /**< Number of scheduled failure. */
> +                       struct rte_graph *graph;  /**< Graph corresponding to lcore_id. */
>                 } dispatch;
>         };

Now, the patch adds a new field in the struct {} dispatch field.

Here is what abidiff reports:

$ abidiff --version
abidiff: 2.6.0

$ abidiff --suppr
/home/dmarchan/git/pub/dpdk.org/main/devtools/libabigail.abignore
--no-added-syms --headers-dir1
/home/dmarchan/abi/v24.11/build-gcc-shared/usr/local/include
--headers-dir2 /home/dmarchan/builds/main/build-gcc-shared/install/usr/local/include
/home/dmarchan/abi/v24.11/build-gcc-shared/usr/local/lib64/librte_graph.so.25.0
/home/dmarchan/builds/main/build-gcc-shared/install/usr/local/lib64/librte_graph.so.25.1
Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 1 Changed (9 filtered out), 0
Added functions
Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable

1 function with some indirect sub-type change:

  [C] 'function bool
__rte_graph_mcore_dispatch_sched_node_enqueue(rte_node*,
rte_graph_rq_head*)' at rte_graph_model_mcore_dispatch.c:117:1 has
some indirect sub-type changes:
    parameter 1 of type 'rte_node*' has sub-type changes:
      in pointed to type 'struct rte_node' at rte_graph_worker_common.h:92:1:
        type size hasn't changed
        1 data member changes (2 filtered):
          anonymous data member at offset 1536 (in bits) changed from:
            union {struct {unsigned int lcore_id; uint64_t
total_sched_objs; uint64_t total_sched_fail;} dispatch;}
          to:
            union {struct {unsigned int lcore_id; uint64_t
total_sched_objs; uint64_t total_sched_fail; rte_graph* graph;}
dispatch;}


What would be the best way to suppress this warning?
I tried the following which seems to work, but I prefer to ask for your advice.

[suppress_type]
    name = rte_node
    has_data_member_at = offset_of(total_sched_fail)


Thanks.


-- 
David Marchand


  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-16 14:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-07  8:04 [PATCH] graph: optimize graph search when scheduling nodes Huichao cai
2024-11-07  9:37 ` [EXTERNAL] " Jerin Jacob
2024-11-08  1:39   ` Huichao Cai
2024-11-08 12:22     ` Jerin Jacob
2024-11-08 13:38       ` David Marchand
2024-11-11  5:38         ` Jerin Jacob
2024-11-12  8:51           ` David Marchand
2024-11-12  9:35             ` Jerin Jacob
2024-11-12 12:57               ` Huichao Cai
2024-11-13  9:22               ` Huichao Cai
2024-11-14  7:09                 ` Jerin Jacob
2024-11-11  4:03 ` [PATCH v2] graph: mcore: optimize graph search Huichao Cai
2024-11-11  5:46   ` [EXTERNAL] " Jerin Jacob
2024-11-13  9:19     ` Huichao Cai
2024-11-13  7:35   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Huichao Cai
2024-11-13  7:35     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] graph: add alignment to the member of rte_node Huichao Cai
2024-11-14  7:14       ` [EXTERNAL] " Jerin Jacob
2024-11-14  8:45     ` [PATCH v4 1/2] graph: mcore: optimize graph search Huichao Cai
2024-11-14  8:45       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] graph: add alignment to the member of rte_node Huichao Cai
2024-11-14 10:05         ` [EXTERNAL] " Jerin Jacob
2024-11-14 12:06           ` Huichao Cai
2024-11-14 13:04             ` Jerin Jacob
2024-11-15  1:55         ` [PATCH v5 1/1] graph: improve node layout Huichao Cai
2024-11-15 14:23           ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-11-15 15:57             ` [EXTERNAL] " Jerin Jacob
2024-11-19 10:31               ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-12-13  2:21       ` [PATCH v5] graph: mcore: optimize graph search Huichao Cai
2024-12-13 14:36         ` David Marchand
2024-12-16  1:43         ` [PATCH v6] " Huichao Cai
2024-12-16 14:49           ` David Marchand [this message]
2024-12-17  9:04             ` David Marchand
2024-12-20  2:05           ` Huichao Cai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJFAV8zFF17ce4sK4zBWE9dRTPFwQ-0v_JRG-g8XqfEuFVJOBw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=chcchc88@163.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dodji@redhat.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=yanzhirun_163@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).