From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5173645B2B; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:44:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8CCB4025F; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:44:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A0A4025C for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:44:27 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1729259067; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jdS41L+2R8Sbctbqq+/Vo33+sWFV6mYr9KMo7FZY9zA=; b=V+fhHpZyGZlP3o8hGJT5dL8LwIB9mW7ST9qhHIiQbj5MD0sNBGrHRPnwYvplMzl3U5Bx+5 1oXerAvEnjmTcVljVG7Dn9hSvUyrdwq+Q/k3qpwpQC1+n9ajZYOvul+WOPVM/BLWm56H/v vc8Kf1E71sT3q+D1OFb3qq3APb6Osu8= Received: from mail-lf1-f69.google.com (mail-lf1-f69.google.com [209.85.167.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-609-RID3lJXAOWSOa70G1KwiQg-1; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 09:44:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: RID3lJXAOWSOa70G1KwiQg-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-539eaa0561bso2143382e87.0 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 06:44:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729259065; x=1729863865; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jdS41L+2R8Sbctbqq+/Vo33+sWFV6mYr9KMo7FZY9zA=; b=BwYqbki+EC9gsR0GQ5fKQe5d0fh9Y7Uwog6Lur83SxNvbDuzJUzDwJ0K4TDoDTJ48w obIOBba/AELMmuQ8pQpbKZau6zIiy81q+JcgJNUQL/JkWs0T57FQhs7P5xqCqrqErkRi b8UxnJUilKgtnftlY3INcP34sxeRghrvVBRrY8I63EBuqRQEwDv/ysMIFrAuFCRgHmHC gK8e1uM4oim9rdh8svWReDj/k8w+GnK+I28+CZAvHSe1++7w9BEIjQq1G1KmVvq9WwOd OECIyNe+hqvnXn8kHd3YhLPgcEh1qiqugWE4qCsGDYCPkTta1Bi/UcqbTErnBaKuhS12 wwXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxmpehL2GtfLqTnyM2ZrrEakFNxvi25dJuO7tgX8joHJmnt0WQG j0A0uwCL074V+DR2Q9llS6ffU2ZjYBGc0V+VVMhQ7VxA2RKzuXujuVElCLCQMOYGIjZFwC6g6nT LEexbBiS2laXaD5sPRa9Ij8+Zl14tAlOIxrdR2R+HipabUubHxfjXq2D4NERxP+nVCUVQxAi2Jt p7/oFvTd3xfHDO/+I= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:31c1:b0:539:8b02:8f1d with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53a154b0defmr1666877e87.30.1729259064949; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 06:44:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEJuvl16mFZk5lNMhK87Sj0SFaMvtNPJ1AwdFLC0JSbXH5pYHjFPgsWvtjxz34LJX9ZRGSpploZHrZeS/GW8Ho= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:31c1:b0:539:8b02:8f1d with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-53a154b0defmr1666854e87.30.1729259064498; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 06:44:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240822153218.3782170-1-akozyrev@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: <20240822153218.3782170-1-akozyrev@nvidia.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 15:44:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mbuf: add transport mode ESP packet type To: Alexander Kozyrev Cc: dev@dpdk.org, dsosnowski@nvidia.com, orika@nvidia.com, nithind1988@gmail.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, thomas@monjalon.net, matan@nvidia.com, jerinj@marvell.com, rbhansali@marvell.com, ferruh.yigit@amd.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 5:33=E2=80=AFPM Alexander Kozyrev wrote: > > Support the IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) in transport mode. > Currently, we have RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_ESP for the ESP tunnel mode. > Transport mode can be detected by parsing the "Next Header" field. > The Next Header is TCP for the transport mode and IP for the tunnel mode. > Add RTE_PTYPE_L4_ESP for the regular transport mode and > RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_ESP for the ESP over UDP packets. > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev I am curious, where is the driver that implements this? --=20 David Marchand