From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E134A0526; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:07:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD81F1C02E; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:07:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22451BFEF for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:07:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1595318834; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Cw6lUYT7YVjvZmipI5sUuugT3rg0fXLh/z8ENu8GREI=; b=OurQUqP2N/WsCyTHl9/W2pfltKjAGLpasRrz2GlbNJ+GOYGwmlrJBwD5RlDlrGN35MEgJ+ K8WBp4Nsx+vOzuK6gxgIS2OKQQ+MCExR70LpNQ2Gf2mQoVQj2QI1eYAX0Xr9dKwdTuLqiF l76bO9S2cUGbsS9scxG7LgELBeTw0cI= Received: from mail-vk1-f200.google.com (mail-vk1-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-265-YVaJEQZGM5qNGCO2PQ3kow-1; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 04:07:12 -0400 X-MC-Unique: YVaJEQZGM5qNGCO2PQ3kow-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id g131so8026461vke.0 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 01:07:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Cw6lUYT7YVjvZmipI5sUuugT3rg0fXLh/z8ENu8GREI=; b=d8OUVd+2xL+ROK2C3+7310aGtxPs0udj5lmdPW22RPi76rBN/RcIwoW5DNCsf2JZCW xYl9EF1P551MYJUQy59UPmlVUPxzhbo6nDne035JNWCrR+NqS/jJMuCN4rcTkAenmpCA 3rf6FIIl9J2xie3SmarTsrtOUGvaZriSt3QC7M5qf7bTV2tIWqIB+HtscsgbmsMUqPiF 2yFHXucJeSv995RY2ENRwuabq01mFfHcK+zhQE+8TYmvnZv4fcqSmDSlB0Zub3Mucvpu +OuaUi7bgx8foBZiBqgJioSx2XqHW/ixjH97mOTav4QggXbKmGGY6kswRZcWoUXnya3d 1sNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339vNsPaD+fAXSLN9D2qrprAYGcAcdE9dBuK2Fz23GnqJeCPhID GkosquVJYnc4JhaBU+1YJQFXwVbuIdsBxQRgtcEO2MGPEMABO++Iq2iFQuQcmkWSHSHh6MUrriE 1C3yautt99zwrRBcoxDE= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:31f3:: with SMTP id w48mr12862012uad.87.1595318831606; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 01:07:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyKStPc3StS1i7QEyo33XOddG14iKl8V63qgRzoqbf2EFRujHlfFPjKG5VUG2Fsr8lTonNSmQaRIABnCEDWZl8= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:31f3:: with SMTP id w48mr12861997uad.87.1595318831399; Tue, 21 Jul 2020 01:07:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6d0bf076-c9bd-564c-20f6-ba8a49bc2389@intel.com> <88ee4323-1336-4bc7-414d-3dd7f19d684f@partner.samsung.com> <3bc99c95-1736-635e-e8af-c9ae47da6d9c@partner.samsung.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2020 10:07:00 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Van Haaren, Harry" Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli , Lukasz Wojciechowski , Phil Yang , Aaron Conole , Igor Romanov , dev , "Yigit, Ferruh" , nd X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Random failure in service_autotest X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 10:01 AM Van Haaren, Harry wrote: > > > > Honnappa's suggestion in the other reply seems to not work here, as the > > > "service_may_be_active" > > > > won't get updated if the service core is stopped after running its final > > > iteration..? > > This also is a problem. > > This needs to be fixed by setting 'service_active_on_lcore' immediately after the > > service completes running in 'service_run' (rather than waiting for the next > > iteration of service_run). > > This is a different bug - not directly related to the service_autotest issue reported > here. I'll keep focus & resolve that issue first as it has higher priorty due to CI failures. Is the current bug caught by the CI something introduced by the recent changes? -- David Marchand