From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"echaudro@redhat.com" <echaudro@redhat.com>,
"mkp@redhat.com" <mkp@redhat.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
"Sinha, Abhijit" <abhijit.sinha@intel.com>,
"Nicolau, Radu" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/iavf: fix checksum offloading
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 09:39:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zJj7wsSVqA-11SZEqVhhz66RWj3Kh=dvXgUhcCknYz2A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM4PR11MB599440E4516A228BA7AF63FBD71FA@DM4PR11MB5994.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 9:33 AM Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> > If the driver reads l2_len or l3_len, this is an undefined behavior:
> > for example, OVS might have been using l2_len or l3_len for its internal uses
> > (though I agree it would be risky for an application to do so).
> >
> > We probably need to fix access to l2_len a few lines before my patch.
> >
> > if (m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_TUNNEL_MASK &&
> > !(m->ol_flags & RTE_MBUF_F_TX_SEC_OFFLOAD))
> > offset |= (m->outer_l2_len >> 1)
> > << IAVF_TX_DESC_LENGTH_MACLEN_SHIFT;
> > else
> > offset |= (m->l2_len >> 1)
> > << IAVF_TX_DESC_LENGTH_MACLEN_SHIFT;
> >
> >
> > But to be clear, no I don't think looking at l3_len value is better:
> > it should not be read at all.
>
> Yes, you may be correct; it appears that this issue is unrelated to l3_len. The primary concern is to prevent the configuration of Tx descriptors with incorrect values.
>
> Based on your description, it seems the problem arises when the PMD sets MACLEN to 0 and also configures IIPT as 01b, Is this correct?
>
> To prevent this issue, we could implement a check where, if l2_len is 0, we simply ignore the IIPT configuration and keep it at 0. (which leads to same configure with your patch)
The driver is _not_ supposed to read l2_len or l3_len if no valid
ol_flags is set.
I will reject any suggestion where you consider their values.
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 7:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 9:03 David Marchand
2023-08-21 8:03 ` Eelco Chaudron
2023-08-21 8:22 ` David Marchand
2023-08-21 11:54 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-08-21 17:29 ` David Marchand
2023-08-22 1:52 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-08-22 6:11 ` David Marchand
2023-08-22 7:33 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-08-22 7:39 ` David Marchand [this message]
2023-08-22 7:59 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-08-22 10:10 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-08-23 6:29 ` [PATCH v2] " David Marchand
2023-08-23 8:33 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-08-24 15:24 ` Patrick Robb
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8zJj7wsSVqA-11SZEqVhhz66RWj3Kh=dvXgUhcCknYz2A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=abhijit.sinha@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=mkp@redhat.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).