From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35F5A0548; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 09:57:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C1F410EF; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 09:57:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634E440E03 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 09:57:52 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1636621071; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=u6XoDHmzNnIJPg+/mjc+mZXlS/KFqPl44b4Epir3BRo=; b=iHVAc1oolwPNwCMtlReffJ5978teWVboNbS1eYSJ6vVeW34YswMoTUrv3vwNWWKDZOYzCL XpMpJlvJMWtULBq7TEMhOfz/A6xO/GlYJ6bpdT3Zgs+KWZJApW86ogiSGLB2PmIwtjL4Lg TcmuwFxG/nP4PzG8JMYVlTa86o7s8Io= Received: from mail-lj1-f197.google.com (mail-lj1-f197.google.com [209.85.208.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-557-1G7OzYIEPNqZtJltUxJeng-1; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 03:57:46 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 1G7OzYIEPNqZtJltUxJeng-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f197.google.com with SMTP id v13-20020a2e2f0d000000b0021126b5cca2so1500967ljv.19 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:57:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=u6XoDHmzNnIJPg+/mjc+mZXlS/KFqPl44b4Epir3BRo=; b=U0X+sg/xdDHF6Uj4uCIb8fC/Zs155DSOEWGfAjkp4LCp105Ibu7vOnDxvTZ4CbSFBz ZCcM0VSRDCjNfHEvJQ1yM4n4BQTQsnhbdeGeMFdoM2vNaz/JOxW6AE9D/sDmXEepxRzX hLsNgdkWv0Yvq0Be5RacvsxZmsukNKeyI7J1oIRrCDIPsPXNzwAUIQfXzGQf9zw1ELRb ROcCEvnQcJm8zIZ78kq4QNU/wo3J9i1wX7H7Lq4K4+f+x5+xRtrqVvQfxo42cCLVZXGU u7m4JcjnhzV9RFp+FxPp65xm4GxRCBSc7R50JLhwDLN7SEMXL60vLjBPHepMDvkwvjmx SNYA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532s67ovEg0l1qY42ZO5rmuuzbUURUlA4umS05CFZ55nFAyLMRlZ n/7O4Q5lQxTA02DYksggEq1w0NB/etXN81NxnraLqGhsO34xC6mDK6wOmyBqZ0NM+52s8ZdCEwi 3DeIcTn4tWpNuwB5WHt0= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:760d:: with SMTP id r13mr5357995ljc.159.1636621065219; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:57:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBCN+0IrvaY4YaKIU9M++5Y9VaqItD9O0137i3wH00e1jKu2LDG75N9wgmHSzvB0YjYY1OPyroU5743+QHvV8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:760d:: with SMTP id r13mr5357983ljc.159.1636621065029; Thu, 11 Nov 2021 00:57:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2415599.WskMzomRmS@thomas> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 09:57:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-announce] release candidate 21.11-rc2 To: "Jiang, YuX" Cc: Thomas Monjalon , "dev (dev@dpdk.org)" , "Devlin, Michelle" , "Mcnamara, John" , "Yigit, Ferruh" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 9:26 AM Jiang, YuX wrote: > Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11-rc2 test execution rate is 85%. No critical issue is found. > But has some about missing '_mm512_set_epi8' support build issues. Intel has already sent a fix: > Patch Link: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211109172456.147140-1-vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com/ > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > * Build or compile: > *Build: cover the build test combination with latest GCC/Clang/ICC version and the popular OS revision such as Ubuntu20.04, Fedora34, RHEL8.4, etc. > - All test done. > - One bug about lib/librte_power.a.p build failed on OS Fedora35 with clang 13.0.0 is found. > - Has fix patch for litrte_power, verify patch but find new failure, report bugzilla for new failure about fslmc. Thanks, I added more details in https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=881 -- David Marchand