From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA703A0C54; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 14:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4167F40E64; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 14:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B849440E3C for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 14:17:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1630671476; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=huEKHkaumtCar1iWIh0N0UjV95p3QAMczfECoCbLq88=; b=JULNJdMuI+vBTe63UBW1Bb+dSb1RAMLkSVZEO2ynBiEEsjLzAMOeKUoHgA3mJHTDMcLxPC Ui0vOIXgZrEpn/56ZZC1xJ41+/EQ2pDanpQ6B9TKGScGfVjuZ+i8OV/CbQ7OBxg0vYzPR5 grL4q3vPl74DcNH9vJrgaxEizKT68rk= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-208-U9cQ50mRPxWTUCSpn95Y8A-1; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 08:17:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: U9cQ50mRPxWTUCSpn95Y8A-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id b29-20020a2ebc1d000000b001ba014dfa94so2128465ljf.9 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 05:17:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=huEKHkaumtCar1iWIh0N0UjV95p3QAMczfECoCbLq88=; b=gXiv2h26q04XYR6YCsuBYX3gFmcvCrxR2jOJiB45S00Dlu+LtaTGSLfm5he6Lovmnn rh3BcUNEIsVuvJ6Lhzqlk4y5NSYI+3f/XxXBEjjH0wsoibXDDEpRDu9OESNvexM7AlBb XsZvIECEb8FtQe8V4pYye006H3zHNy28uPN2fe7bBnnIBygDYe4Xoz7tuDZnoDEYZBxW WhSjXHtFZgRcoz9Nytb7EJB9U+vx24hdbigzVVFpan6+eDTWP+n7sLMsy91fUmQIRL7f aCujwge7kUsxaiMOkBuSg7nBx3idJDUNb7NDz+YVsZR22uEWT6KziZoEwinmqjbgg+ke +ySg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ND7jeQmHmcGCWyqBEhYQ3Id0BnZBC7gAkOFoAd1y+/tOzLxJ5 4eMhowLCLM2yYVswnUJ0daqYoRf850mgmntxhq7kg67bQGDskS6puxIvdBb3+Ank0cua/RyZv9e ziRYtqXKiaB5qGXjKyHQ= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4949:: with SMTP id b9mr2736791ljd.159.1630671470090; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 05:17:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzumMIs/cXSKRac6RAJ/1pgpfT6bRDZZ2emOAIXlqVsU1Y+CTS/K89EExr02W0SJNWjVQu6t9VDyBFWYJmD0v0= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4949:: with SMTP id b9mr2736712ljd.159.1630671468458; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 05:17:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210901015054.340542-1-xiaoyun.li@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20210901015054.340542-1-xiaoyun.li@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 14:17:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: Xiaoyun Li Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Ferruh Yigit , Andrew Rybchenko , Ray Kinsella , dev Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: remove experimental flag from getting intr fd API X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 4:03 AM Xiaoyun Li wrote: > > Remove the experimental tag for rte_eth_dev_rx_intr_ctl_q_get_fd API > that was introduced in 18.11 and have been around for 11 releases. > > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li Odd that this API is used nowhere in-tree but it provides a simple alternative to the DPDK interrupt builtin framework. I had a go with this in OVS, and it seems to work as described (once fixed virtio-user). Acked-by: David Marchand -- David Marchand