From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask too long
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:12:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zU+R4k0nnXit2jjpTN--bUdndH9MPOJu7miSBxsKUnDA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210922122920.34759-2-david.hunt@intel.com>
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 2:29 PM David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com> wrote:
>
> If the user requests to use an lcore above 128 using -c,
> the eal will exit with "EAL: invalid core list syntax" and
> very little else useful information.
invalid coremask*
>
> This patch adds some extra information suggesting to use --lcores
> so that physical cores above RTE_MAX_LCORE (default 128) can be
> used. This is achieved by using the --lcores option by mapping
> the logical cores in the application to physical cores.
>
> For example, if "-c 0x300000000000000000000000000000000" is
> used, we see the following additional output on the command line:
>
> EAL: lcore 128 >= RTE_MAX_LCORE (128)
> EAL: lcore 129 >= RTE_MAX_LCORE (128)
> EAL: to use high physical core ids , please use --lcores to
> map them to lcore ids below RTE_MAX_LCORE,
> EAL: e.g. --lcores 0@128,1@129
>
> Signed-off-by: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>
> Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
> changes in v3
> * added this patch to the set. Addresses the changes for
> the -c option.
> changes in v4
> * fixed buffer overrun in populating lcore array
> * switched from strlcpy to strdup due to a clang error
> ---
> ---
> lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c
> index de1717946f..19d3588f78 100644
> --- a/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c
> +++ b/lib/eal/common/eal_common_options.c
> @@ -747,15 +747,23 @@ check_core_list(int *lcores, unsigned int count)
> static int
> eal_parse_coremask(const char *coremask, int *cores)
> {
> - unsigned count = 0;
> + unsigned int count = 0, k;
Same as patch 1, no need for count.
> int i, j, idx;
> int val;
> char c;
> + int lcores[RTE_MAX_LCORE];
> + char *coremask_copy = NULL;
Contrary to patch 1, coremask_copy is used.
But, coremask is const, we can directly use it in log messages.
So same as patch 1, please remove coremask_copy.
>
> for (idx = 0; idx < RTE_MAX_LCORE; idx++)
> cores[idx] = -1;
> idx = 0;
>
> + coremask_copy = strdup(coremask);
> + if (coremask_copy == NULL) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Unable to duplicate coremask\n");
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> +
> /* Remove all blank characters ahead and after .
> * Remove 0x/0X if exists.
> */
> @@ -767,30 +775,64 @@ eal_parse_coremask(const char *coremask, int *cores)
> i = strlen(coremask);
> while ((i > 0) && isblank(coremask[i - 1]))
> i--;
> - if (i == 0)
> - return -1;
> + if (i == 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "No lcores in coremask: %s\n", coremask_copy);
> + goto err;
> + }
>
> - for (i = i - 1; i >= 0 && idx < RTE_MAX_LCORE; i--) {
> + for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> c = coremask[i];
> if (isxdigit(c) == 0) {
> /* invalid characters */
> - return -1;
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "invalid characters in coremask: %s\n",
> + coremask_copy);
> + goto err;
> }
> val = xdigit2val(c);
> - for (j = 0; j < BITS_PER_HEX && idx < RTE_MAX_LCORE; j++, idx++)
> + for (j = 0; j < BITS_PER_HEX; j++, idx++)
> {
> if ((1 << j) & val) {
> - cores[idx] = count;
> - count++;
> + if (count < RTE_MAX_LCORE) {
> + lcores[count++] = idx;
> + } else {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Too many lcores provided. Cannot exceed %d\n",
> + RTE_MAX_LCORE);
> + goto err;
> + }
You can invert those blocks:
if (count >= RTE_MAX_LCORE) {
RTE_LOG();
goto err;
}
lcores[count] = idx;
count++;
> }
> }
> }
> for (; i >= 0; i--)
> - if (coremask[i] != '0')
> - return -1;
> - if (count == 0)
> - return -1;
> + if (coremask[i] != '0') {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "invalid characters in coremask: %s\n",
> + coremask_copy);
> + goto err;
> + }
> + if (count == 0) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "No lcores in coremask: %s\n", coremask_copy);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + if (check_core_list(lcores, count))
> + goto err;
> +
> + /*
> + * Now that we've gto a list of cores no longer than
> + * RTE_MAX_LCORE, and no lcore in that list is greater
> + * than RTE_MAX_LCORE, populate the cores
> + * array and return.
> + */
> + for (k = 0; k < count; k++)
> + cores[lcores[k]] = k;
> +
> + if (coremask_copy)
> + free(coremask_copy);
> +
> return 0;
> +err:
> + if (coremask_copy)
> + free(coremask_copy);
> + return -1;
> }
>
> static int
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-09 13:45 [dpdk-dev] build: Increase the default value of RTE_MAX_LCORE David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/6] build: increase default of max lcores to 512 David Hunt
2021-09-09 14:37 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-10 6:51 ` David Marchand
2021-09-10 7:54 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-10 8:06 ` David Marchand
2021-09-10 8:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-09-14 9:34 ` David Hunt
2021-09-14 10:00 ` David Marchand
2021-09-14 11:07 ` David Hunt
2021-09-14 11:29 ` David Marchand
2021-09-15 12:13 ` David Hunt
2021-11-17 15:55 ` Morten Brørup
2021-11-17 19:01 ` David Hunt
2021-09-15 12:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] eal: add additional info if lcore exceeds max cores David Hunt
2021-09-16 12:34 ` David Marchand
2021-09-20 9:30 ` David Hunt
2021-09-21 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list too long David Hunt
2021-09-21 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-09-21 12:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-21 11:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list " Bruce Richardson
2021-09-21 12:04 ` David Hunt
2021-09-21 13:16 ` David Hunt
2021-09-21 13:20 ` Bruce Richardson
2021-09-21 13:51 ` David Marchand
2021-09-21 15:10 ` David Hunt
2021-09-22 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " David Hunt
2021-09-22 12:29 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-09-23 8:12 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-09-23 10:21 ` David Hunt
2021-09-23 8:11 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list " David Marchand
2021-09-23 9:47 ` David Hunt
2021-09-23 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " David Hunt
2021-09-23 11:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-11-02 17:45 ` David Marchand
2021-11-03 10:27 ` David Hunt
2021-11-03 10:29 ` David Marchand
2021-11-03 13:30 ` David Hunt
2021-11-03 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] eal: add additional info if core list " David Hunt
2021-11-03 14:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] eal: add additional info if core mask " David Hunt
2021-11-05 10:50 ` David Marchand
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of acpi lib David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of pstate lib David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of cppc lib David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/6] lib/power: reduce memory footprint of channels David Hunt
2021-09-09 13:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 6/6] lib/power: switch empty poll to max cores config David Hunt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJFAV8zU+R4k0nnXit2jjpTN--bUdndH9MPOJu7miSBxsKUnDA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).