From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF24A00BE; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8446F1D56E; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:01:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-2.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5961A1D53A for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:01:49 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587999708; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NdqVumChjExcPFB1pTq4QoDqEBycoUEOaEPfvGM9tZc=; b=HAsk6NJ82XuOFQwposU0rBVPE/VD1RqKeODyB4BgoMqyeDNmixy+vQtW0YDKYwp4UA2ZZ1 kx+a1XqIiAKoPU6jUUxMENRzRUJevFy8TCEYcvIPwGN4z0Xpkqi45SFC+w/VYjbV9o+GMq GtoYiHnPid8+cLbt1xHmHutSnPAEPKM= Received: from mail-ua1-f70.google.com (mail-ua1-f70.google.com [209.85.222.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-303-5U_oO9VfN1u-Cxap6H0aZA-1; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:01:33 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 5U_oO9VfN1u-Cxap6H0aZA-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 60so2084223uaq.9 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:01:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NdqVumChjExcPFB1pTq4QoDqEBycoUEOaEPfvGM9tZc=; b=BvTSWYHN4b0E37XXreTk6RuJl3+g9CGlIfacwcJt+0HRz9SM36Hn3aZ8pHCjOeIorA 55UT1lonrDgvAa3sjtIpUpjEV1+EEuUt6bcDAT7DXhkL/9Y4NduQ01la28Xar0JtDR7R 9SuW8+g7RS0UaqsR7QkSVtXzQkA11nGFqep7pHQWVw1fVBathV3KcpimUVkDeRLgZuIG UcH5d5AyEuxzcp2Z2SRNEMEWtCKq/9mYtaJwKPR8MrkFnzISrH8/rnXqjVL676XwGkJ/ zrzHBzJ3EJ/KbpFf0AFU3Ab6XD37xJlFl0aAd27Hg4cOl0/yWIwbKH1TL/Ouh1Rb4l+h UIVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYczn6c3n1rMjZIuUohq4Oniby/uCHAQKdJtjK+WOQx5v/GWEcn I4CyDurK8x5728dZRs5GQ+GQPV1Fky+JCsXRs5YrX39ieJNVZWf9/wOood1XfX618cASoMNOssB qwH7Yw8/uqRdiNxvYA1k= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:114f:: with SMTP id j15mr17270808vsg.180.1587999692785; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:01:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIBYAcwIyn3fr0NVaPx9t7fS3jOl9KAWxnh5Ij8w3+R4BjXfoXfgwlMBhIoqJfS79gZSVB2KGNj4q7eKSfXLug= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:114f:: with SMTP id j15mr17270749vsg.180.1587999692379; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:01:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200427075048.6afca853@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200427075048.6afca853@hermes.lan> From: David Marchand Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:01:21 +0200 Message-ID: To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Liron Himi , dpdk-dev X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] rte epoll functions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:51 PM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:27 +0000 > Liron Himi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We noticed that the implementation of rte_epoll_wait doesn't stopped on= signal such as SIGINT. > > > > Is anyone know why? > > > > If that on purpose and cannot be changed, how application can exit grac= efully when using rx interrupts for example. > > > > Regards, > > Liron > > > > I noticed that, submitted a patch, and it has been unmerged for 9 months > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/patch/57047/ - Indeed, there was no review nor any comment about the "bien fond=C3=A9" of this patch for 9 months, - We don't need a new symbol, this should be fixed + symbol versioning to keep current behavior. --=20 David Marchand