From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22A4A32A1 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:37:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1F21E8B3; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:37:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3DA1E8B2 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:37:06 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1571909826; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=aYUQVn5y8JifLoJYhNvWxp4UhG/eNKFjDauVU5d7g5c=; b=gvCeCwmElF7m7OQA4FnT1w2GusvukAXHm17YT5OMsxeO/V9AO1i/DaPSWPc18ftdLm3mnb +CbfWJ49DXRydP5hzPgcf9mBGDhAmP7/2rkBt150Fzl3LVvixceV3C1etcmqL4xQkUOXEU zk2hyLHoW8x0c6nf8fR6k80MsRk5Crc= Received: from mail-vk1-f200.google.com (mail-vk1-f200.google.com [209.85.221.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-148-gAlk0d1zNQWQ6dQ-appTfg-1; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 05:37:03 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id d64so10486627vke.6 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 02:37:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AmENPjCdcuirqyfwO5gq3Jpna64QhUhFmO9cnpnD/nI=; b=Zm/mIKrF/EFk1TVzZKTWRsy4BVdC6Ct8lP+VNya1ot2gLJShTOo9JA36ET3KzZim7H /n4FZL0cC2WKTUDqj/PchYD+42ybUNxrfJJDxxtCuTUSFWQweHnP1txncGNlpK6k67gJ YgQ5dvJM9MpV969iTvjlJbpTYvObTbNYOLqsuxyYzSX+ik6uYUcIPdxkioNKBYUR0qiE 8xkH/TdDFb8zAmgP+E/mDJ6s7kav1cxwOEb2Oeka5YiR5Frt4rggbkKnsbqGP3zK8N7S s1UIsX90987vllDNSpv+g6giXkdVLkDNSKsqgPvp896dcGnFo98BFQuS5wRaTKBangRm g5XA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVzALfsB6vi00LEKukOY6r6QCycI2FbEgGScA8pBjVbH7QFO3JO pk1AVd965n2SFmcTXyZluwE7Aap4vnBvbTpIOQFX9mBSaOg7IeHuoCxzebjKi6w54oePcAT9dLf QYyL+3c/fuCruxy5IIrI= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:628f:: with SMTP id z15mr8004550uao.126.1571909822327; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 02:37:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx0YqRgD/7pBhp0GlX7Z7wA1aD0vj61lBZS95tEqIoSPoo+QmrSrGKt85BOpblJbw0qPz5oNf1oYI1guvS1HmQ= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:628f:: with SMTP id z15mr8004534uao.126.1571909821877; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 02:37:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190925214223.79362-1-drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <632f90cf-c795-d99a-3e18-0138711c00ee@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <632f90cf-c795-d99a-3e18-0138711c00ee@intel.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 11:36:50 +0200 Message-ID: To: David Christensen Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" , dev , Ferruh Yigit X-MC-Unique: gAlk0d1zNQWQ6dQ-appTfg-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal:ppc: fix incorrect ifdef for ppc_64 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:44 AM Ferruh Yigit wrote= : > On 9/25/2019 10:42 PM, David Christensen wrote: > > An ifdef present in eal_memory.c references "RTE_ARCH_PPC64" when > > it should actually use "RTE_ARCH_PPC_64". Simple testing revealed > > that both the PPC_64 and non-PPC_64 versions of the code involved > > work, but the PPC_64 version of the code is retained to be > > consistent with other instances in the same file where mmapped > > memory is accessed in reverse order on Power platforms. > > > > Fixes: 66cc45e ("mem: replace memseg with memseg lists") Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: David Christensen > Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit Applied, thanks. --=20 David Marchand