From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B39A00C2; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:02:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E281D164; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:02:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4782C6D for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:02:14 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1587740533; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EL/rxHeC96CH7rT4L+Ol/bQ+g8jHFUC7resFo0fSE5c=; b=awvzcbMdUUxwzvl6WIxJADqdVFkjE3nh3jSz3B2t2XkjPHlmR8iMVVlGUtZiDhkx7ulnXe 6A9L0fflechJ6V6i8cX0e7f6ugUDmlKWyNAdP0c/NYd7x5jlW0WpCI/E6OipIVBkZb4Gy0 ZlGsRO0bRLxi++BsYbpC1pt+77IwR/4= Received: from mail-ua1-f72.google.com (mail-ua1-f72.google.com [209.85.222.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-226-YKEatnTiPvGnQldhJ-YUxg-1; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:02:08 -0400 X-MC-Unique: YKEatnTiPvGnQldhJ-YUxg-1 Received: by mail-ua1-f72.google.com with SMTP id q18so5220340uap.4 for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:02:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Qsx3hBN/sJMZCz7bOyHU5aQ4I/3vp4hreZu+xjXfZBM=; b=pFAOqkgJjuwV+nts2j/i5InfuxdxfBWGeq90HvbA1JwSu1Fa+b6AnC/p/QyDlRxrQZ 0L0dz4QhV+4WLFsJobllVP0AepCYclRracRqyrdHZpVzUoPhR9AtDViNuKnxXAcAHyZq M37rwTHUL0n1PYZwYOq/+8qw82p0rA1L7zfm8ePv2U1ZV8foMMape92jFwV0Ai9nSAkL suVb70VmtDRHc+s8dYOWDh+Rrz1uFTyWXv+hEBtgHkFuN+63PQ6y30QlZyhymZLE8xbH 8DYWCKMsGA10w9ha2R1krrnUUIUdBbkdhAlhPUKHN2HHaO8J/tTlwb5IYiO7MTlpjkgX xPvg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZUR1GHn0D+nvbY/wpnlGh2rnc4UybkpsFB5ffnVN/UyP58je2C ww9woXNnzQ+idIVrHZWpSLkPFsFZeCEPz/Rd4bKM3LMPFo5elpXEWEyfFZBbu44X/GKi5XTGi9X 840aS4YX7g5kOnF7oE38= X-Received: by 2002:a67:487:: with SMTP id 129mr8309067vse.105.1587740527507; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:02:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypISsZnoHWJM4/mCYuPkbdelhuJoMgYCp2IxWtFqF+mvVHPOJULYLWth7FeJSPwD2u9OZXEacZjcmprnCUoB3wc= X-Received: by 2002:a67:487:: with SMTP id 129mr8309022vse.105.1587740527175; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:02:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200420093421.68984-1-mdr@ashroe.eu> <20200423064144.19613-1-mdr@ashroe.eu> <2d93bafb-0909-fcb8-5900-664a68088682@ashroe.eu> In-Reply-To: <2d93bafb-0909-fcb8-5900-664a68088682@ashroe.eu> From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:01:45 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ray Kinsella Cc: Dodji Seketeli , dev , Andrzej Ostruszka , Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Monjalon , Neil Horman , Jingjing Wu , Wenzhuo Lu , Matan Azrad , Shahaf Shuler , Viacheslav Ovsiienko , Jerin Jacob , Nithin Dabilpuram , Alfredo Cardigliano , Mahipal Challa , Cristian Dumitrescu , "Wang, Haiyue" X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] abi: change references to abi 20.0.1 to abi v21 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 4:50 PM Ray Kinsella wrote: > > ah ok, the particular system I made the change on was Ubuntu 18.04.2. > which is libabigail 1.2.0. > > Given we still support v19.11 on Ubuntu 18.04.2. > I think it's worthwhile keeping the suppression until v20.11? 1.2 is fairly old and does not seem maintained by Ubuntu (asked for backport, and got ignored so far). https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libabigail/+bug/1863607 Dodji told me that there were new checks added in newer sersions. I also fear that supporting an old libabigail version will force us to add a lot of other rules. In Travis, we currently use libabigail 1.6 (mainly because I did not update to 1.7 when it was released). --=20 David Marchand