From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA23A0524; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:06:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A90FC93C; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:06:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6E7C938 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:06:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606377979; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dkzsJsRaAL5apA28gACiv68VWOzugLY2kEREE4cJ6dk=; b=JaWv/SrJE05M/JVP5C5THNwMc3dm5BPELUL21V46cENkr5qYGaJYnh/RGYPwULR/TKimub 7zWKc3UOxNmbwQRSGou0cEXkJ7rCyWcGNvsI9Eew9RWkvwWKl7ks7KxPVvZS8z4hoLy0G7 esB5V/N8NjsjeFJMoJNQ2OiPR4yoQtE= Received: from mail-vk1-f197.google.com (mail-vk1-f197.google.com [209.85.221.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-164-7oqZenGzPvi7qaAP4pfEvg-1; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 03:06:16 -0500 X-MC-Unique: 7oqZenGzPvi7qaAP4pfEvg-1 Received: by mail-vk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id b199so294338vkf.8 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:06:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dkzsJsRaAL5apA28gACiv68VWOzugLY2kEREE4cJ6dk=; b=eBQhW/t8O2XjTQjh2loHmyfi8rR/xVVWm4i87o5QtB5ycdrYGhGeCUyHTReaj0uBEe WaJiBtNmMrzaMNMvD4O4XI1Wf387yBC4iBnMV2+bIq7HPXdgRCP5xYeOs5vIzoKEZcvq pyRJKcXWdCVnfPWlgyGQJ77uN61S1itw528haPavAQwXEpiTUpNFhRApecue03z+GKmG TSGWAyvYaOT2Far7/CNvvgdSYJjrljI+CWSv2jzvdLNNku5kXUmtSI/HypRUEi8qpnEe Szt7Yf9XU0Pn/vccmehqNMPJGUYLfWlAzJYjQVgCxA0v4l/xj0ymA6Uwi8d4mQH/I9cy 3Gpg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532/STRGcZRdq7ZCS8Iqj6G77oKCBvhKz0xU/lnShVsQF7nOlSzG NRolg6p7E9x4oQcuFnhW2+1RlA/4C+q1ycLw9AfOWVMBGMDgSVKU82tUnaZjFt0mgltHrbr07VU LJ9GefDIOUc77/bwGC2w= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2362:: with SMTP id o2mr942223vsa.5.1606377975874; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:06:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEVyA+nyCicRV9v9b0MjEZX0YUiVcZCDhDuSUJB5sY3Py8Ox6sD0uf+FPu4UVY8adS24HaFmK+F5pQIG/6//g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:2362:: with SMTP id o2mr942216vsa.5.1606377975662; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 00:06:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201124215700.12126-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:06:04 +0100 Message-ID: To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: Aaron Conole , dev , Michael Santana , "thomas@monjalon.net" , nd , Ruifeng Wang , =?UTF-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ci: hook to Github Actions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 5:47 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:45 PM Aaron Conole wrote: > > > Thanks for working on this. Sadly, I think we will have to abandon > > > Travis soon - given the new changes it is looking very awful. Robot > > > already is starved for job time. > I am looking at [1], is DPDK not considered as open source project? > > [1] https://blog.travis-ci.com/oss-announcement Ilya (@OVS) contacted the Travis support. The reply is that a project that has sponsored contributors can not ask for free tokens on Travis CI. I personally did not try to contact their support given this response. > > > Since we don't have ARM test runs, I guess we will have to rely on > > > something else for that coverage now, but I like that there is > > > coverage included at least to compile. > > > > For ARM test runs, UNH is a good candidate but nothing prevents other ARM > > based CI from being added. > Is it possible to keep Travis CI for Arm? For individuals, the 10k credits with the current DPDK jobs get burned in something like 4 runs (read: 4 runs a month). Even if we narrow the configuration to only ARM, this will at best give us x3, so let's say 12 runs a month. Now consider the ovsrobot and the number of series that hit the list on a worst^Wbest day like a week before rc1. > > > I will need to update the robot to pull information from github > > > actions, so for now it will need to be manually checked (but here's an > > > example of a run: > > > https://github.com/ovsrobot/dpdk/actions/runs/382073265). What's nice is > > the robot is already primed to run the jobs, so that's good. > Is there any guarantee that GitHub actions will be free forever? There is no "forever". At least, UNH lab which the project sponsors seems viable on the mid/long term. -- David Marchand