From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DAFCA0C4B; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:02:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F70D41101; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:02:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F444067C for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:02:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1636189327; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R28H98PqN9yw8rb/i5bJP6pBDDOhKRToKI/f/4kuCrA=; b=XEeGnr0v0EvZbd1YtHHOJB3g5Gf1wUkHPQdajyJJbF9Vdxre93ko/awGAT163sdd4WXgrs gOzIAyx1PFeTvGC3OTRtLcdP9onCaWv8LtXZO4nBoo7luKpE8pGAsEtOtZZzMLIXZhYZnT SNOrtXjyJ/JQP8MUWxeq0EwqaH4ZaS8= Received: from mail-lj1-f198.google.com (mail-lj1-f198.google.com [209.85.208.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-258-faYRmwnaMaeeCAG5YGyAMg-1; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 05:02:04 -0400 X-MC-Unique: faYRmwnaMaeeCAG5YGyAMg-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f198.google.com with SMTP id g7-20020a2eb0c7000000b00218a595caacso2225579ljl.5 for ; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 02:02:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R28H98PqN9yw8rb/i5bJP6pBDDOhKRToKI/f/4kuCrA=; b=0tWq9NYpRNzSjYtxQesjTEdYfx1zZ0Hb34xXaIj82agVHLE8fOTZARrKA5hctKnAuI ny7lD+k7Mnn18tqLYBBWn5U0vYQJAB0DItJvjnj2uUlnbGt5jheYCuarrilnrhOJ8XdT VvfPIm+RXWm7m4M01n5IP1+3J+bvcgkI5brj/xZ38E2aZe/E/nnBT2NI+Xeiy6PK147V /cFtLiAFPptRLObKxSIbgZ2/CkxeabusXmmRgeJZYxoE4/4CMCZbDSVQySXv81/JKRsQ kHZvvt2NQXJktsvQqMc8eciwYcTv4dHz2foPo0o75fUHAgs53SgjddkTlLi2qBHY1SLA ojjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303qOLH+5SswystYxtjIy4kZ21ET8a7CRf69cizR4HWqVhlPB97 uwOWUniwRfUBuvkaGlKkRqanZ5N9BlagGwOjANsLDSdss2cKllMFkBX4bkK5AiFG6S73zW82szA ObmcRFxFhZtFv969VMxE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e11:: with SMTP id i17mr57064657lfv.560.1636189323175; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 02:02:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz7erB6b/8DcD/ESDzkN1wS8pOZyWJFwcort8SrPOD12kaS2bjiESCSW4uzxFL4X+lNDbEA+ufilF7P+qBmjnw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3e11:: with SMTP id i17mr57064639lfv.560.1636189322996; Sat, 06 Nov 2021 02:02:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211105211031.2604275-1-thomas@monjalon.net> In-Reply-To: <20211105211031.2604275-1-thomas@monjalon.net> From: David Marchand Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2021 10:01:51 +0100 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev , "Iremonger, Bernard" , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , David Hunt , Fan Zhang , remy.horton@intel.com, dpdk stable , Kiran Kumar K , Nithin Dabilpuram , Radu Nicolau , Akhil Goyal , John McNamara , Pavan Nikhilesh , Sergio Gonzalez Monroy , Maryam Tahhan , John J Browne Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: remove repeated repeated words X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 10:11 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The script devtools/check-dup-words.sh can detect some words > which are duplicated. > Err, that's one of our private checks. Good to pass it every once in a while. But checkpatch.pl itself is supposed to do a similar job for new changes. > Fixes: fdec9301f52d ("doc: add flow classify guides") > Cc: bernard.iremonger@intel.com > Fixes: 4dc6d8e63c16 ("doc: add graph library guide") > Cc: jerinj@marvell.com > Fixes: 30d3aa861db5 ("doc: rework VM power manager user guide") > Cc: david.hunt@intel.com > Fixes: 0d547ed03717 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: support configuration file") > Cc: roy.fan.zhang@intel.com > Fixes: e64833f2273a ("examples/l2fwd-keepalive: add sample application") > Cc: remy.horton@intel.com > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > --- > doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/prog_guide/graph_lib.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/ipsec_secgw.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/keep_alive.rst | 2 +- > doc/guides/sample_app_ug/vm_power_management.rst | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst b/doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst > index f0ed5a1a04..7dae0bc8c6 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/flow_classify_lib.rst > @@ -366,7 +366,7 @@ Packet Matching > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > The ``rte_flow_classifier_query`` API is used to find packets which match a > -given flow Flow rule in the table. > +given flow rule in the table. I think the "Flow rule" form was intended. > This API calls the flow_classify_run internal function which calls the > ``table.ops.f_lookup`` API to see if any packets in a burst match any > of the Flow rules in the table. ^^^^ See here. Otherwise patch lgtm. -- David Marchand