From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACB9A0547; Wed, 19 May 2021 10:14:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8981740041; Wed, 19 May 2021 10:14:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4C74003F for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 10:14:43 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1621412082; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type; bh=/rsV5lsW7C0kNix85kcsFDbDaJ62FAbbm9UTXw3mtUA=; b=RLqbUDB6qome35MnV37QXj0btBL/vsqYunkaY91od3i9FjYJgtYCK8o5YlDgSiTIu0Md+g koMBqKf8uyaWH7nCAaZ0Yxo1qgceYU3B+VIGPEiRtvim0F6ky8iYAIgZiv83eyMmZB0rkj XgN1Xuhy2bSr4+Mzp/2TSAmQF4SY3M0= Received: from mail-vs1-f72.google.com (mail-vs1-f72.google.com [209.85.217.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-129-gkOj1nMhNoSzMcOD_ipXUg-1; Wed, 19 May 2021 04:14:40 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gkOj1nMhNoSzMcOD_ipXUg-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f72.google.com with SMTP id q16-20020a67d7900000b0290228198e77b6so2752861vsj.23 for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 01:14:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/rsV5lsW7C0kNix85kcsFDbDaJ62FAbbm9UTXw3mtUA=; b=j8ezgdStq9kI9/YZpKa9VSvNbAgC0E4bQpUoLdUYXustf/MOooYnTCVbbRK/UvHRTo IVdHBkDXC+rKOv4gNgIBrC/IkeGVv5FdvhjGgcSnUhSWzcD2yYa8cMNQYzRxmVT3Tm6P kwmh+VqPR0u5hUwmxUjUDoStcCCvEuDvDlK34MHLkRxu2bGoDqSgME/3658LGyLYwBlR WAbzp8cENmFrI9URPv3Q2I6BTqVDz6aE1xcAf3WRt7V3AicoSRbQhAjSUg+8XnvtV8pA L8yuUqRHbqu2aQlHOA3hXkooOGM1NH77WLW3l9GxKrNcZrNKPFpoazPHuS+OfrwG5Lq7 AN3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533+7mvB2xDPkUQoKQ0rPjWWTv3j6kwu5c+HWzdJ3LbQtTIDFxIS cmaLESXPw4+y5Da7tnDWOICYhuII4igQoylj3A/+4ZEr0YLAfyqoCxEFqFmiCQ4QcIwyuIGdVhD gKIHCEGerbv9gQ0MbjJM= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:132a:: with SMTP id g39mr13751212uae.53.1621412080119; Wed, 19 May 2021 01:14:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy1fl7m9gpx6VbqknNRlyXBgbeQwZs48RGALqQu8dfWIwpU0d86/5JwnAlQUHTy4GJjNTIiD4fLQJaO8hKNYnE= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:132a:: with SMTP id g39mr13751188uae.53.1621412079919; Wed, 19 May 2021 01:14:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 10:14:29 +0200 Message-ID: To: dev Cc: Aaron Conole Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [dpdk-dev] Recent random failures on alarm unit test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello, I noticed a few failures on the alarm_autotest unit test in UNH lab. The trace: RTE>>alarm_autotest check if the callback will be called Callback setting flag - OK. [cb_arg = (nil)] check if it will fail to set alarm with wrong ms values check if it will fail to set alarm with null callback parameter check if it will fail to remove alarm with null callback parameter Expect 6 callbacks in order... In test_multi_cb - arg = 0x1 In test_multi_cb - arg = 0x2 In test_multi_cb - arg = 0x3 In test_multi_cb - arg = 0x4 In test_multi_cb - arg = 0x5 In test_multi_cb - arg = 0x6 Expect only callbacks with args 1 and 3... In test_multi_cb - arg = 0x1 In test_multi_cb - arg = 0x3 Testing adding and then removing multiple alarms In test_remove_in_callback - arg = 0x2 Error, cancelling head-of-list leads to premature callback Test Failed Does it ring a bell to someone? -- David Marchand