From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AA742C05; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 17:18:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF9940DDC; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 17:18:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5D6406BA for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 17:18:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1685632722; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Hnu8yrcQ6qDx5c3j0HsbwDUcEEar4fklGMZMN5CImcg=; b=IzfJAmwokqcyQgHr09joOcdXOAit06MThqJb3gfZGkJBncA7Vg8ejvoc0umKUcp7WQdQAT X1hnm03dEoWOBw3ChRC30dbLqiUjqGAFVwK18ObWXUaUhFZ+4LtP/y2nA9U2kuzFgUFIFq 8Yye1LnnWsoRJCSUt66Vx4osKdnEM5k= Received: from mail-pj1-f70.google.com (mail-pj1-f70.google.com [209.85.216.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-654-QLkw34k5P2GJcp7VI4SJbA-1; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 11:18:28 -0400 X-MC-Unique: QLkw34k5P2GJcp7VI4SJbA-1 Received: by mail-pj1-f70.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-25667878a53so361839a91.3 for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:18:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685632706; x=1688224706; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Hnu8yrcQ6qDx5c3j0HsbwDUcEEar4fklGMZMN5CImcg=; b=BX7gRdVKJWJgC85SHJvD4xiCZeGa0x4GjEuJ05L+4r+PcEpfLMbLdYwsnC3wxuejYR ejwVJ+K8iiv+xWcIrySlE5BHlGDtmsN8jdFZbXcm250xgJ5NRx8h4vdI/pmnBDTTV03s rIQRSv3OA0ilKj7mQlCt7h3mp5kKwVwwNr415AHxIfO+U0sJuSUipQIM3JdkttPnWrKk gmrDAYlFahn7ZWBEvicXvk+V3YRRuJhL/K3TC0zC4R3bF6o59PEjQ+z/s5YmIRvKCVxa PQpXV16X7LMCpomD/TDNGvDndcJLcveRhLQMmivYzLglDBCWHdcKeoduvcAv5SVtYulZ B2Bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxny5dsDJZJXrs2N102Ns7Bmce6GXt11jHosULI/8FreD3+yzpa cb7FL6lCEE6vyO71cUX9Qbov7OJwCuBzliesznKQz/04IqJ729UGdIm+WT3+CoHu+D5Bk7ZYmHx IwusjV0mwxRtOCoN+Jaw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ce82:b0:1b0:4718:8832 with SMTP id f2-20020a170902ce8200b001b047188832mr7426690plg.63.1685632706120; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:18:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6GqJ4etjRBsPQcqUBITqDPM9PPA7GQGChp5cXFoSiafMH8HBW7ONqJyNbvcGDrixn/xTygvpBldKR6SjN+MDs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ce82:b0:1b0:4718:8832 with SMTP id f2-20020a170902ce8200b001b047188832mr7426669plg.63.1685632705858; Thu, 01 Jun 2023 08:18:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230525162551.70359-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> <8298877d-43a3-2cd6-5bea-e268fb49ae62@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <8298877d-43a3-2cd6-5bea-e268fb49ae62@redhat.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 17:18:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/28] Add VDUSE support to Vhost library To: Maxime Coquelin Cc: dev@dpdk.org, chenbo.xia@intel.com, mkp@redhat.com, fbl@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, cunming.liang@intel.com, xieyongji@bytedance.com, echaudro@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com, amorenoz@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 4:59=E2=80=AFPM Maxime Coquelin wrote: > > - patch 4, 5 and 6 go together, with patch 6 being the fix itself. I > > understand it was easier to review as splitted patches, but maybe it > > would be simpler to squash them to make the backport trivial. > > If possible I would prefer to keep them as separate patches, it will be > much easier to understand the code in the future if a regression > happened. > > I'll help the LTS maintainer with backporting it (i.e. request to also > pick patch 5 and 5). 4* > > Does that work for you? Ok for me. --=20 David Marchand