From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (xvm-189-124.dc0.ghst.net [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87B3A09FF;
	Wed,  6 Jan 2021 09:23:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB56316089B;
	Wed,  6 Jan 2021 09:23:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com
 (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6E51606D8
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  6 Jan 2021 09:22:59 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
 s=mimecast20190719; t=1609921379;
 h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
 bh=mXcpvhgGxtWWjt+hDCwMBUdLx+eKeN86cKzu3O4j4Ic=;
 b=B1fGr3KXVtZKZ2QoU5rZthhSOm5r8mcPrP7kTJn3Qu67yBR0/dWZ9+m1AEsNfcCs0ukdzf
 onW9nwziSZAZwL1a3RUjeLaaAVn3xdDvh/bbdlyWhM2VIprRU41KXSQozv6/ddGE62p6Ny
 bM6XBkA7sQWd8DHb6CUMSSkLLty13SU=
Received: from mail-vk1-f199.google.com (mail-vk1-f199.google.com
 [209.85.221.199]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-258-DxPmboh6OrufnkEavIpcHg-1; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 03:22:57 -0500
X-MC-Unique: DxPmboh6OrufnkEavIpcHg-1
Received: by mail-vk1-f199.google.com with SMTP id n24so1144869vkm.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:22:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=mXcpvhgGxtWWjt+hDCwMBUdLx+eKeN86cKzu3O4j4Ic=;
 b=jG+1qzLFo9pnXiUIDayb49RxyVXedF//dxcFz196XuMur+3pNQgVY9wyVPNuJm/1ru
 XgY7Vp1FhC9LcgJhhJeDigvy+a85GA3qfJZrLAdcNrpMaHe5cAYPiCNxUOj30hLsPiWF
 mP6a4zV0vZTkTwtsKmA1p7KxQ2I9LtlICMI46+JulkuQsXkwql9XjxJbOfRTlUM25JIs
 tRz8LQANbL54KkemN+LYxqtx+JEGmgZQ2t22jX29ai9h+ahdOKE3MSgctNllaNipmJ7+
 5636C/Pwbq7eX4a3M5w2c+f3zLJyqrTtQ6H3nG1f4RNazqk7dGkc1FjQHXYln4cYw5EK
 s6sA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308ftadc6vceN1X6bUOo3/hbbouFrcDUx9owR1Aki7/tt+oH/jY
 ExxtpRBJDdQqVTux9cIRUqSKtO67vu2/6Cu4rtC7esrZ1fZEeZEwThNegsgIzHGXaYm9y0AJNVC
 dUNxQTWma/WmRCJRIPbk=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9e83:: with SMTP id h125mr2683187vke.18.1609921377105; 
 Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:22:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgfSzO2uqJuNWM8/PFuIZVJSM8j3nDOvkekU9U/CpyLw8kRn7jJY2I44L4my/3AmwahpKaWLjCpW8mzrxamiM=
X-Received: by 2002:a1f:9e83:: with SMTP id h125mr2683178vke.18.1609921376887; 
 Wed, 06 Jan 2021 00:22:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20201220211405.313012-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
 <20201220211405.313012-8-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20201220211405.313012-8-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 09:22:45 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zjXoz7_-=1RUUKUrKHEQ710xdnY6654rPaCdm5ewr18w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, "Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>, 
 Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
 Adrian Moreno Zapata <amorenoz@redhat.com>
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com;
 auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/40] net/virtio: move MSIX detection to PCI
 ethdev
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:14 PM Maxime Coquelin
<maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> There is no point it detecting whether we can use MSIX
> every time the interrupt is enabled/disabled/masked.
>
> Let's do it once for all at PCI device init time.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

Is this a rework/fix of fe19d49cb525 ("net/virtio: fix Rx interrupt
with VFIO") ?


-- 
David Marchand