From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
cian.ferriter@intel.com, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/9] net/pcap: fix argument checks
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 08:52:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zknCjjyPJ3-u+hS4GfGWQ9Z-_K6_a=x_ecSKCn-ZuYrg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001125315.6191-2-ktraynor@redhat.com>
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 2:54 PM Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Previously rx/tx_queues were passed into eth_from_pcaps_common()
> as ptrs and were checked for being NULL.
>
> In commit da6ba28f0540 ("net/pcap: use a struct to pass user options")
> that changed to pass in a ptr to a pmd_devargs_all which contains
> the rx/tx_queues.
>
> The parameter checking was not updated as part of that commit and
> coverity caught that there was still a check if rx/tx_queues were
> NULL, apparently after they had been dereferenced.
>
> Fix that by checking the pmd_devargs_all ptr and removing the NULL
> checks on rx/tx_queues.
>
> 1231 struct pmd_devargs *rx_queues = &devargs_all->rx_queues;
> 1232 struct pmd_devargs *tx_queues = &devargs_all->tx_queues;
> 1233 const unsigned int nb_rx_queues = rx_queues->num_of_queue;
> deref_ptr: Directly dereferencing pointer tx_queues.
> 1234 const unsigned int nb_tx_queues = tx_queues->num_of_queue;
> 1235 unsigned int i;
> 1236
> 1237 /* do some parameter checking */
> CID 345004: Dereference before null check (REVERSE_INULL)
> [select issue]
> 1238 if (rx_queues == NULL && nb_rx_queues > 0)
> 1239 return -1;
> CID 345029 (#1 of 1): Dereference before null check (REVERSE_INULL)
> check_after_deref: Null-checking tx_queues suggests that it may be
> null, but it has already been dereferenced on all paths leading to
> the check.
> 1240 if (tx_queues == NULL && nb_tx_queues > 0)
> 1241 return -1;
>
> Coverity issue: 345029
> Coverity issue: 345044
> Fixes: da6ba28f0540 ("net/pcap: use a struct to pass user options")
> Cc: cian.ferriter@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
This patch hides the coverity warning.
But can't we just remove those checks?
Iiuc, the checks on NULL pointers are unnecessary since
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=a0fce1193ce13a50c00624cb36605ebef7a3e60b.
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-30 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-01 12:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/9] Coverity fixes and other cleanups Kevin Traynor
2019-10-01 12:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/9] net/pcap: fix argument checks Kevin Traynor
2019-10-04 10:57 ` Ferriter, Cian
2019-10-30 7:52 ` David Marchand [this message]
2019-11-05 16:40 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-11-05 17:10 ` Ferriter, Cian
2019-11-06 19:03 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-10-01 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/9] crypto/octeontx: fix possible NULL deference Kevin Traynor
2019-10-01 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/9] net/bnxt: remove logically dead code Kevin Traynor
2019-10-02 1:28 ` Ajit Khaparde
2019-10-30 7:43 ` David Marchand
2019-10-30 16:27 ` Ajit Khaparde
2019-11-05 15:39 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-10-01 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/9] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check logic Kevin Traynor
2019-10-30 7:59 ` David Marchand
2019-11-05 15:41 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-11-08 14:45 ` Xu, Rosen
2019-11-08 14:47 ` Kevin Traynor
2019-11-08 14:35 ` Xu, Rosen
2019-11-08 14:52 ` Xu, Rosen
2019-10-01 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/9] net/ipn3ke: remove useless if statement Kevin Traynor
2019-10-30 8:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2019-11-08 14:35 ` Xu, Rosen
2019-11-08 14:52 ` [dpdk-dev] " Xu, Rosen
2019-10-01 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/9] net/ipn3ke: remove commented out code Kevin Traynor
2019-10-30 8:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2019-11-08 14:40 ` Xu, Rosen
2019-11-08 14:51 ` [dpdk-dev] " Xu, Rosen
2019-10-01 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/9] compress/octeontx: " Kevin Traynor
2019-10-30 8:06 ` David Marchand
2019-10-01 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 8/9] event/opdl: " Kevin Traynor
2019-10-03 10:50 ` Liang, Ma
2019-10-01 13:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 9/9] net/bnxt: " Kevin Traynor
2019-10-01 15:42 ` Ajit Khaparde
2019-10-30 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/9] crypto/octeontx: fix possible NULL deference David Marchand
2019-11-06 19:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2 PATCH 0/8] Coverity fixes and other cleanups Kevin Traynor
2019-11-06 19:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2 PATCH 1/8] net/pcap: fix argument checks Kevin Traynor
2019-11-06 19:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2 PATCH 2/8] common/cpt: fix possible NULL deference Kevin Traynor
2019-11-06 19:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2 PATCH 3/8] net/ipn3ke: fix incorrect commit check logic Kevin Traynor
2019-11-08 14:50 ` Xu, Rosen
2019-11-06 19:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2 PATCH 4/8] net/ipn3ke: remove useless if statement Kevin Traynor
2019-11-08 14:49 ` Xu, Rosen
2019-11-06 19:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2 PATCH 5/8] net/ipn3ke: remove commented out code Kevin Traynor
2019-11-08 14:50 ` Xu, Rosen
2019-11-06 19:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2 PATCH 6/8] compress/octeontx: " Kevin Traynor
2019-11-06 19:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2 PATCH 7/8] event/opdl: " Kevin Traynor
2019-11-06 19:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2 PATCH 8/8] net/bnxt: " Kevin Traynor
2019-11-08 14:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [v2 PATCH 0/8] Coverity fixes and other cleanups David Marchand
2019-11-08 14:41 ` Xu, Rosen
2019-11-08 15:15 ` David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8zknCjjyPJ3-u+hS4GfGWQ9Z-_K6_a=x_ecSKCn-ZuYrg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=cian.ferriter@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).