From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32B641C30; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:21:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D0F40ED9; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:21:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 369734021F for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:21:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1675776096; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jQSVF80c2TutxMimQ8nPFERhTe3yLRYT4kLd466oVdk=; b=hMJVFGn27e4SQ4I0cMuprjbtvRIXyCjbL2JnLtLZ9rgdv0Pbs2fjJdZRRLzOd5GbX+G2MW 74ucYn67GpzaANeSyBZ6VlkVlC/TXtonOJ4wii6KrCDQqeRiR6vc5J8cJYr4lwAp5XCbas MDUClGkyuIPgmg82wTKgikQXGz7ds6o= Received: from mail-pj1-f69.google.com (mail-pj1-f69.google.com [209.85.216.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-453-Exqm0b3MMu-LuDyE-eXBPA-1; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 08:21:35 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Exqm0b3MMu-LuDyE-eXBPA-1 Received: by mail-pj1-f69.google.com with SMTP id b12-20020a17090ae38c00b00230c29c443aso2455909pjz.5 for ; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 05:21:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jQSVF80c2TutxMimQ8nPFERhTe3yLRYT4kLd466oVdk=; b=tViLf4/H5kzhduoHrWImGBdDoTq6tbv1jQd+LuSvVa8OBPCHVBRLLJaDCCifl5y/tt Yr8JinoMZKHMhEgk8AXYyBwRPdjIpQnt3WcNPfgbjxk6LoarVmbKQbA0U3ab0B6jXDht ufMKVI25/bmbOCUaku9e8doKuHmbSXVahPyxib7QFNzkjcue1WGiorXPYEgXgLQOLxmv n5EEy+9GdbR4KKXGcf3MdbcovD44JAyhAUzV9dJ8rFcZsA7mTAMNB4SdwxdTi7cEBQbg U0bRO91kN7gFAfr7P1UPbSreSkcAs360IHAfU8sDjXTyriiiXBevfbkhx6fqXP1HCAj0 fmhg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKX1OanvsWa/2a8OMRBwlx9ycm/iExquM1pQ9CIbJ0QMCQCu3Hcd A5CprSkrnoAgRLZJ8IRfeMAoqOTeYqT9PzkMLgTJLVDdtuciPbh0f20J+YTJ8IOlpGn5O35f9Rc KLsCOgJ044JOUQiS2I9U= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ec8e:b0:198:f240:7e52 with SMTP id x14-20020a170902ec8e00b00198f2407e52mr708290plg.13.1675776094592; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 05:21:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/oydKuy03/0aNvUuBnlxMKsZRhgOba/uT2L+e+8H1mRpRRid1n8ZDFhhKdwrQX32+ww4kyMCCiM0yc3qlewwc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ec8e:b0:198:f240:7e52 with SMTP id x14-20020a170902ec8e00b00198f2407e52mr708280plg.13.1675776094269; Tue, 07 Feb 2023 05:21:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230131024851.11121-1-haijie1@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <20230131024851.11121-1-haijie1@huawei.com> From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:21:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/mbuf: fix mbuf_autotest retest fail To: Jie Hai Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com, liudongdong3@huawei.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 3:52 AM Jie Hai wrote: > > Retest "mbuf_autotest" will fail because the mbuf pool was > not freed after previous test successful done. > This patch fixes it. Good catch. > > Fixes: efc6f9104c80 ("mbuf: fix reset on mbuf free") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Jie Hai Reviewed-by: David Marchand -- David Marchand