DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com,
	 anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/9] Cleanup VFIO API and import Linux uAPI header
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 09:08:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8zp1E2+sWzL3=8HmnOhjc_kZYEc42=Ki0gGz20K142Srw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250903151800.1965006-1-david.marchand@redhat.com>

On Wed, 3 Sept 2025 at 17:18, David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> The VFIO headers have a number of issues:
> - showing to the world a lot of internal considerations,
> - defining macros with the VFIO_ namespace (confusing, and a source of
>   conflicts with the VFIO official uAPI),
> - wrapping around VFIO uAPI in case the kernel headers do not contain the
>   expected API (putting the burden on DPDK developers to find the right
>   way to detect the presence of a VFIO feature),
> - (somehow related to the previous point) supporting old version of the
>   Linux kernel while DPDK now requires a v5.4 Linux kernel at least,
>
> This series proposes to cleanup those headers by hiding as much as
> possible internal macros and structures, then removing the explicit
> inclusion of linux/vfio.h from rte_vfio.h (pushing this inclusion to the
> application which may want to do some funny stuff with VFIO and should
> already include this header on its own) and finally importing the VFIO
> uAPI header from Linux v6.15 for internal consumption by DPDK
> components.

There was some hiccup in a clang job in GHA.
Recheck-request: github-robot


-- 
David Marchand


      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-04  7:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-03  7:28 [RFC 0/8] " David Marchand
2025-09-03  7:28 ` [RFC 1/8] vfio: remove confusing check on VFIO presence David Marchand
2025-09-03  9:38   ` Xu, Rosen
2025-09-03  7:28 ` [RFC 2/8] vfio: assume VFIO is always and only present on Linux David Marchand
2025-09-03  7:28 ` [RFC 3/8] vfio: remove public wrappers David Marchand
2025-09-03  7:28 ` [RFC 4/8] eal/linux: remove more internal VFIO macros David Marchand
2025-09-03  7:28 ` [RFC 5/8] eal/linux: remove internal VFIO wrappers for old Linux David Marchand
2025-09-03  7:28 ` [RFC 6/8] vfio: stop including Linux kernel header in public and driver API David Marchand
2025-09-03  9:38   ` Xu, Rosen
2025-09-03  7:28 ` [RFC 7/8] uapi: import VFIO header David Marchand
2025-09-03  7:28 ` [RFC 8/8] vfio: use imported uAPI header David Marchand
2025-09-03  9:38   ` Xu, Rosen
2025-09-03  7:50 ` [RFC 0/8] Cleanup VFIO API and import Linux " David Marchand
2025-09-03  9:29 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-09-03  9:52   ` David Marchand
2025-09-03 14:25     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-09-03 15:13 ` [RFC v2 0/9] " David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13   ` [RFC v2 1/9] drivers: remove unneeded VFIO header inclusion David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13   ` [RFC v2 2/9] vfio: remove confusing check on VFIO presence David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13   ` [RFC v2 3/9] vfio: assume VFIO is always and only present on Linux David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13   ` [RFC v2 4/9] vfio: remove public wrappers David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13   ` [RFC v2 5/9] eal/linux: remove more internal VFIO macros David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:13   ` [RFC v2 6/9] eal/linux: remove internal VFIO wrappers for old Linux David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:22   ` [RFC v2 0/9] Cleanup VFIO API and import Linux uAPI header David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17 ` David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17   ` [RFC v2 1/9] drivers: remove unneeded VFIO header inclusion David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17   ` [RFC v2 2/9] vfio: remove confusing check on VFIO presence David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17   ` [RFC v2 3/9] vfio: assume VFIO is always and only present on Linux David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17   ` [RFC v2 4/9] vfio: remove public wrappers David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17   ` [RFC v2 5/9] eal/linux: remove more internal VFIO macros David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17   ` [RFC v2 6/9] eal/linux: remove internal VFIO wrappers for old Linux David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17   ` [RFC v2 7/9] vfio: stop including Linux kernel header in public and driver API David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17   ` [RFC v2 8/9] uapi: import VFIO header David Marchand
2025-09-03 15:17   ` [RFC v2 9/9] vfio: use imported uAPI header David Marchand
2025-09-04  7:08   ` David Marchand [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJFAV8zp1E2+sWzL3=8HmnOhjc_kZYEc42=Ki0gGz20K142Srw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).