From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C95A04BB; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:32:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1B01B69F; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:31:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2701B696 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:31:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601994711; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=MnsaeVOnfLWeQ6IPOQ8e8VLjyoZ0ssuJ+R7QLiauq7M=; b=EDnqIs3wcinGo87WXdtzHIHrkuZTh2VDmBr6xVOMHS8iVrrLXyO4HmSBqK6jHXzvN6MAe1 3jZLfDKH0gSKOBISk+Uuck5zMRtK6HB4N2f9i8UhPRNOMzDP9Zi33e/nMHtD1bkllh6K4g arVXUK69egXvSeQ0Duw4z/sIolf1wus= Received: from mail-vs1-f70.google.com (mail-vs1-f70.google.com [209.85.217.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-530-0xO6BkOTMOmWqRtshp7mgw-1; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 10:31:48 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 0xO6BkOTMOmWqRtshp7mgw-1 Received: by mail-vs1-f70.google.com with SMTP id d190so4017194vsc.15 for ; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 07:31:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MnsaeVOnfLWeQ6IPOQ8e8VLjyoZ0ssuJ+R7QLiauq7M=; b=n23H88K0QAwzY+Sd+ZKawAFZTvW/B91QJTqhtZ7MZjyyNC2b2LtDyhreYDvyKGKQc4 Qk6ZW1Do3v4kIUj++og/eCDqJcHK3dwx0dl3/vQ4FwyFKEaSlBxZPagFpL+Zd1Zkph1f rFVh7y+ZI7g64OY9LH0t6dchM+tYR6Fn8G3DNAyXngdhHQ9Q1mzsqh8c4Yf/zg76UfvM LbkFnY6wSmC81zx7VoKApmVxTlJ0YW9cT4BDlZw6yPuWisplWXgJ1vRSPLFR7JaEDL3q +CJ5LUjmFVt1/BquvCQEdP9CLhSunNNbPuPgP1O8kLys6Grs+sN48DoO2QbCzsrB7akD aq8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Nm2G6k4GLOLrIoMsq1DtYCkHXc51/uDYM9YKWtnlqPAWa2v7h oX9MoTeGIpGD0u/D9iTtWNCddo/QpMatcO9YxSMB2xuLK7o0mnFN7mbjZ6fb3wxhY7ZXqHmdO2M mZUTfTd9Q8Ph9LLWrNQA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:5d:: with SMTP id k29mr3217517vsp.17.1601994708463; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 07:31:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyt1dzCQEjmhf0ldNtvjNiTWU5bh2BpT3fSWS3XPfzSbFt4i9gugY4V0sm+tsbYslgeEYGqzHwABt8mPHJJu8o= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6102:5d:: with SMTP id k29mr3217356vsp.17.1601994707130; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 07:31:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 16:31:36 +0200 Message-ID: To: Vladimir Medvedkin , Bruce Richardson Cc: dev , Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran , Ray Kinsella , Thomas Monjalon , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/8] fib: implement AVX512 vector lookup X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello, On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:35 PM Vladimir Medvedkin wrote: > > This patch series implements vectorized lookup using AVX512 for > ipv4 dir24_8 and ipv6 trie algorithms. > Also introduced rte_fib_set_lookup_fn() to change lookup function type. > Added option to select lookup function type in testfib application. > > v8: > - remove Makefile related changes > - fix missing doxygen for lookup_type > - add release notes Now that https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=84fb33fec179ea96f814aed9f658d5a2df20745d is merged, some bits in this series need rework (patch 4 and 7). I see we are adding an API to control which vector implementation of the lookup is used. Is this required? My previous understanding was that the SIMD bitwidth work would supersede this. -- David Marchand