From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFD1A034F; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:30:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02763407FF; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:30:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3FF40696 for ; Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:30:20 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1633678220; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iVuUQjzvvlqLcwfMQ5snON2iSQSPTT2oekf2DQArhYk=; b=ing7yDnlK/xO9q9+xJXK26XI12Fk43S5dhHAZo3ot5PO1SPsMSMpD3eLK5UGE1s9tX6YXx ss4kpohzed165RPPtBjSdGYoiN3h0uaxX/RFXlI0qgALkIEu60KETQPlKkCxKCq/ckVgO2 GElF448Vkp6V7BG3U1PkkEo86anE3fg= Received: from mail-lf1-f71.google.com (mail-lf1-f71.google.com [209.85.167.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-21-XU25PZVUMWaSZDdSP3FHGA-1; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 03:30:18 -0400 X-MC-Unique: XU25PZVUMWaSZDdSP3FHGA-1 Received: by mail-lf1-f71.google.com with SMTP id x29-20020ac259dd000000b003f950c726e1so4267039lfn.14 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:30:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iVuUQjzvvlqLcwfMQ5snON2iSQSPTT2oekf2DQArhYk=; b=YTzPq/8WsX0VQsv11BXiDoiyOTUyNd/so5OPbOZKCIsqKfI+p+orTPZyjR5pq49MQm cdBcVNYgG3ZDYSNIUD052EwdRFg3AXlW7x3987y9iLtlU43+pa1+RG2GwbMfTKlkAFZI Qn8eK350O8Av/ZP62oRHWO0WORur7++ZU1p3GKaBy6eKCxfC1OtiaNzTwkVCc+tZ0jOj Xr8PMYO9Rj2nVTba4KGlXboKJVFVN45I5poFgl0xtHLNyDc1wwOrnyc7+IYgNgzYGSMu V2L7QGtrisHUhEZOlLasglmbP38z97OrcuQjrAXwJHdz+7nxfdtWz5IKNKzIEkzVq4dF DZRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533cX5u8fplr0EiiRdZlvYQivfm0+YlAQX8X1Mq9zJu0R6nL7AFP vieiwS4ZC9Srus4E1Xrtmo4Ub38R/c0RAjJcq6LH+qXAXQxSlsjKkPew9WFPZG5U1xMv8gvNN7o lwcwUy5bJHoYvsKx7RH0= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f02:: with SMTP id v2mr1844645ljv.46.1633678216740; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:30:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwH/f27i2zpz7MVW0RXtJ7Xf3g5jfHU1pDlEYFhEriytHek3jV1TFZ0UUEolyl8A7cldcbQ4ruUSIZnjo6tWNI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f02:: with SMTP id v2mr1844634ljv.46.1633678216560; Fri, 08 Oct 2021 00:30:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: David Marchand Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2021 09:30:05 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Chen, Zhaoyan" , Lincoln Lavoie , Ali Alnubani , Aaron Conole , ci@dpdk.org Cc: dev , Thomas Monjalon , "Yigit, Ferruh" Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Should we keep autotest.py ? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 3:08 PM David Marchand wrote: > > Looking at how to add an autotest, I came upon autotest_data.py used > by autotest.py which has been in DPDK for a long time. > > From what I see, DTS directly calls the test binary. > The public CI relies on meson to invoke unit tests. > > Is the autotest.py script still used in some CI or can we remove it? Looking back in history, we lost ability to call this script with make removal. So I'd say we are fine with dropping it. See 3cc6ecfdfe85 ("build: remove makefiles") Going once. -- David Marchand