From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9510A0C43; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:23:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F75A40150; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:23:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7223E40150 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:23:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1634757819; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lHG3Qzjqiajb4zSvW05o4FKIDdueAYaZd0Y80GbaG3Y=; b=eUl7bnyG30cupNDs41SIGv/AQCjCkKDISbyZkVt/TgS/F6DDKGBYu2Ua35CxbYPvvi/KYe 4Efe5BsI6yN6nxa2ETQIjYAH0ORHZ50G3TmROsgfVelt2FFv6oRxKJBUpA9K6uXsfIJZYH 9BolKZHgNJLo7rIJgsv/W4tkQURftZk= Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-155-ryuhCKBVMnCaNldYRx6nxg-1; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:23:30 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ryuhCKBVMnCaNldYRx6nxg-1 Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id k13-20020a05651c10ad00b00210d682c600so2232527ljn.11 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:23:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lHG3Qzjqiajb4zSvW05o4FKIDdueAYaZd0Y80GbaG3Y=; b=Uet1raarFBBqHqfa71EKdkFbateszVRZ5NNgYv005vJPgncmMnF4U2UCZor01ru3mh /PleucbXuLdS1VLBMcZB9p1nB/LzmYwxDAWt27tcIz/6RZmVIlBGIX1zij0fiCkbI99q Nm1gxdXky4Y2ngpwCrrfBoBRCGjoj1QKxfIeGeACcm9F1ekDu9IEW1KS0FJH5Pit9Ak3 P2wZpqn/kT7+c6LDeIHnh85ZgsROq5qoF/gc28zxBXbjDcO50u4Oe9LutEbQSs37pK2z mYTvXYYlRO4DO+VJ6/msqCla6rcMKwb/yThD9+cly60htjxpO4o+LpYkgnePqfpwiv++ r7Dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533oj8EQimyJpQbAcOWbFjOEz3O7PSwsr+JpkWKkH3S3hQ1PyY2p +lzcmsSb9cDHbujmKaZadNqER5suSo1OOIqd+xcu2Ab+Un1x3Sm8GosPVyxFu93p8gepZy/YS9W TjVNmmtVJHLRwSLC8BB4= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:46f8:: with SMTP id q24mr1090534lfo.484.1634757809132; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:23:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypL9W0wdpUzlR3gJ61w4gyH/CVXhXT08STexjBsV3ANaTrKZ4sX42WSUowpv+3CdwkIauAtaffzvxMV6xzkrA= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:46f8:: with SMTP id q24mr1090517lfo.484.1634757808955; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:23:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211015022710.13296-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20211015022710.13296-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> From: David Marchand Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 21:23:17 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Wang, Yipeng1" , Vladimir Medvedkin , Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: dev , Ray Kinsella , Stephen Hemminger , Dharmik Thakkar , nd , "Gobriel, Sameh" , Bruce Richardson Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=dmarchan@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] hash: promote APIs to stable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 4:27 AM Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > Promote APIs to stable. > > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > Reviewed-by: Dharmik Thakkar > --- > v2: > 1) Removed EXPERIMENTAL warning in comments > 2) Promoted all the APIs except rte_thash_*** APIs Yipeng, Vladimir, Are we good? Honnappa, One nit which I can handle when applying, if others are ok with patch. > @@ -217,7 +214,6 @@ rte_hash_count(const struct rte_hash *h); > * - -EINVAL if parameters are invalid > * - A value indicating the max key ID of key slots present in the table. > */ > -__rte_experimental > int32_t > rte_hash_max_key_id(const struct rte_hash *h); > > @@ -430,7 +426,6 @@ rte_hash_get_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, const int32_t position, > * - 0 if freed successfully > * - -EINVAL if the parameters are invalid. > */ > -__rte_experimental > int > rte_hash_free_key_with_position(const struct rte_hash *h, > const int32_t position); There is still a @b EXPERIMENTAL banner for this function. -- David Marchand