From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f68.google.com (mail-it0-f68.google.com [209.85.214.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4568A5F48; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:25:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-it0-f68.google.com with SMTP id p3-v6so25257818itc.0; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:25:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QcKoMSLm7BGRKgXNBtG2t1eRazSC69/Z3Ezph2+vsWk=; b=lD1xDA/ET43L2Pivzbru8vhTk70XVP4LksxYy8+oVLzXl99xKpeo9tV9Ahg6d0RWwK 2X8JJlb1NodvbWaiRXxnINGLpPlTnuqBxojGTQuU/ZVBQhLU7LuJZ+POBfzGHtZElExk czTR0kp0hzID3yW7RD8cumW23rhVqohaDR1X1VdBI7GaZYCigkEybmRWoWIb4//oXtMv s/6vxVmXahZmhmVPawRXfPXq3axa5d4ji+KV3VwiQlUXB0OT2k8+l8/yd+MK2+9epyZc lvpdQuYlzFhUsVq2ANbheaLGyOLZugY4VTCQbCjGT/3Hp99hiXGvCp7aMiXos5ZiIBmX OsjQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QcKoMSLm7BGRKgXNBtG2t1eRazSC69/Z3Ezph2+vsWk=; b=tmSoZUEgXDsW9DKZR/aJ3rMWXIy9MO36SDIvZVz8H191CSjdgIen89yYvtYuS0fmDt Yp53DAm1zH3C2ox092AO8qipE31v0P/99LVH6b7Rs+0z8GhYiRWU9QRRmsu+JA8tEBUI 4KD5MHgdNr4PY83ujFmQTRpwwaN1O2E5jKyqi9YeWMjdaFik7BJlpXmSNzXXkGgFDJT6 a9YBJXtEoHg7m5lu7LxrpJ3jJ4xef4vQN+xqGrv2JF9tkJtMoKW3V6c+UgbqGVz2G1YU R/yMSiHeTOvAZ87/+KJbaFgX71+jGvUJAtCEBPH3n8OZoFz5K8Ax/9k2zdAGA7ZDxVGJ hDRw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBS6s8Jv5XS63m7PReDo7jk4OYP/MUmPxQPL9xvTjEd2zMsgW3L jFyJGrmGsGcnUq2Frs5LFhXOVmQOEFrI4o4b9G4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqJqn8O0ta319vdVeAHo65fH18keMJ2j/CJ0qMp5neN+dG1O8wnJMfMSIcPC5MJg+pX7N9CBNYY13B2qc7837Q= X-Received: by 2002:a24:8a47:: with SMTP id v68-v6mr2858907itd.21.1524770755517; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:25:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.192.164.227 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 12:25:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2051185.1oe58NAx7W@xps> References: <1894848.7syooBVSF5@xps> <624561fa-af4f-ac20-ad25-19224a64e1c5@intel.com> <2051185.1oe58NAx7W@xps> From: Andrii Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:25:55 +0300 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dev@dpdk.org, "Van Haaren, Harry" , marketing@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 23:04:22 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] how can I get a git version of Latest Major release? (18.02.1) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 19:25:56 -0000 when its not clear how to get a stable release from git - it sucks. I don't care which part of team it is: web, dev or marketing. now there should be one more stupid joke about broken link. On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:27 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 26/04/2018 18:15, Ferruh Yigit: > > On 4/26/2018 4:58 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 25/04/2018 19:23, Andrii: > > >> The problem here is that common dpdk user is not able to find a stable > > >> repository > > >> from a website. > > >> That would be great if dpdk.com/download or dpdk.com/dev would > contain > > >> a direct link to http://dpdk.org/browse/ for example. > > > > > > It is already like that. Check the first link of http://dpdk.com/dev > > > > just in case to not confuse anyone :) https://dpdk.org/dev > > Oh! So it's right, there is not link to git from dpdk.com/dev ;) > > Andrii, I think your point is about improving the website experience, > with a better wording perhaps. > Please be aware that it is a work in progress by the marketing group > with the Linux Foundation. They will share some big improvements soon. > > > >