From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A14F8A057B;
	Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:02:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6782E8F;
	Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:02:31 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-wm1-f42.google.com (mail-wm1-f42.google.com
 [209.85.128.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC1F3B5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 09:02:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm1-f42.google.com with SMTP id l20so10885939wmi.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 01:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=S5vHodw/5IaXFAO0pfppY3QsRRKhA4lZlm0pHZAR+3g=;
 b=BwiLl7SwBtYOiJ8Bnh8ze0IPZ/0GNG8A9zbKW/S1dbAbh+huAQjyTNAMCr0QzTojom
 J3JyKEOBTwS8G8kDjNzQcnUzDvF0tSQgkPB1c7sFwRo+Fv90VsaP/Y4axlWG1QnNp/aN
 cFm3hJhm5x2DOJ51ehkT5ic5qSDGvg1m3jlCf7/2JgjwwbzWN2tcNTJq/5/8MG7FENWy
 azdeiRVh0c2Y9d9R4bIaz6o9rXXtar8H5UvHhS6NRxGL3GV9pRZf5HEYRDTDrksJZMV/
 PJK3VtEZ8zZDMLZNYhBWennbbY7MSaB0v0XPk1YEhsVeoFTmVhcd8oHdG0iGhOMxlCOa
 PJ6w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=S5vHodw/5IaXFAO0pfppY3QsRRKhA4lZlm0pHZAR+3g=;
 b=kErGdnFoIEMn1GKac113y1OBiygK0eQ7FqKgbWLLO77UyfpkniEkbf92SvCyTLf/5l
 PFEmn6Jfjg3uqYczPk+HtV7qmDgSofCyxzCEdixk1HZTPEL8H5UqbaQ35DkDeIy9ivdh
 vgNSaAftFpSwTYu03qROtZr3bursumph4c8RpW6pD8san2nTh7CDp9DSvF1FlAPEc/Pp
 rATv70QztbQU7fxi8aeBaQufII3sh1UOYoNDMSqWyR3G08Db9Nx51bKn0rMF7qjyvt6y
 8/6TodJbWRZhFIbF06UOFEDBStAF/kYDcrbwWP2nJg+zHH297HEm8fzYhrJlf4gwPQog
 RlFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0380TBH5c9rszyHPBMi9Ty0mMPsKwjyt/BV4KCCWsGzBSd9y1O
 017oyUAclrkQko7ivzo8cU6scWfj9zVdUuO0zIw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtL6mkfLWP3wWVtQg/bboxQXucL9t8BnmNMVc+ZaHKNy5gGT25+bs2w9lDPsDQ5PTFxjxCnKdrqONhEFXaaog8=
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c75a:: with SMTP id w26mr19685131wmk.2.1584864148933; 
 Sun, 22 Mar 2020 01:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMxxxdP3_FkNpi-c9Eq4z7B_1w9FcsvttVo_XMaH1OX4zBcH1A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMxxxdP3_FkNpi-c9Eq4z7B_1w9FcsvttVo_XMaH1OX4zBcH1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tanvir Kekan <tanvir.kekan@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 01:02:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJLP_YBz_E5ixyJyRsrjvUm2wBCWoCAq-W=bOv66EXUFmYRqdQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adel Belkhiri <adel.belkhiri@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Exporting DPDK network interfaces statistics
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Have you looked at mirroring the traffic
Of each interface to different vf ?

Thanks
Tanvir K

On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 11:47 AM Adel Belkhiri <adel.belkhiri@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello guys,
>
> I'm trying to develop a monitoring tool capable of exporting some
> statistics about DPDK network interfaces. The problem with spawning a
> "secondary process", the way proc-info does, is that not all the network
> interfaces are "seen" but just those managed by a single primary process.
>
> I was wondering if there is another way to implement this without spawning
> many processes.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Adel.
>