From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jyotisr5@googlemail.com>
Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEB3156
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:16:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id ep20so213518lab.31
for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:17:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type; bh=4fNCTz6OME4QDmXrfkguKkcjaVfN7FmHfTAZkzIedHM=;
b=tBPAigCexw89egFKvh3LkQOsl9SIiV4SgQzG8th2YY+I28v5yspoxsaBvwnuca3NuU
+EQznPnIAll9m+nIU4PlIw/N59gcsPaHSAn/aGZ44dXkSaAKBi47Eu+eTxRxtxq+eNJf
HjN4TAlMG/hPCYQvX8uE5mjYSfNAq3Je//Uc8mrLJ8q2dkqxy3AmqPaAFtyktFz5zNkT
eTbQ9hgu7C4rUbYZ9kK+HSS4dUXptyI699cVtl+aYIiAX8pClT7NrSbynd8PqI3p5+MC
PbZiU26Jo2lJsXBCWfTHYfoKKkzv2HMPXtP+7M/spA+R4UHvjaJ2DG3bi2DaoQB56IWX
wYnw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.202.167 with SMTP id kj7mr677209lac.43.1384341466143;
Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:17:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.168.98 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:17:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20131105160437.GK26200@debian>
References: <CAJn5u1mMHhg+k4ExoSCJinWUvBTXhkcJK=d9JXnSruFZ6e=HSg@mail.gmail.com>
<20131105122319.GA26200@debian>
<CAJn5u1m5wgm3XrNGCkpgQSnLeVeoTQ=BGJHuuATpuaZZmUSYhQ@mail.gmail.com>
<20131105160437.GK26200@debian>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 16:47:46 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJn5u1kz=y533NXeP=h49TRbn75U3aEA0DG7Lby=b4P++X5qsA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jyotiswarup Raiturkar <jyotisr5@googlemail.com>
To: Jyotiswarup Raiturkar <jyotisr5@googlemail.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] pci_unbind.py failure
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
<mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 11:16:51 -0000
hi
I got my application running inside a vm (vmplayer) where the VM emulates a
e1000 NIC (82545EM). But rte_eth_dev_count() seems to return 0.. From the
website looks like it's a supported NIC . My lspci and pci_ubind status is
below. Any pointers?
# ./tools/pci_unbind.py --status
Network devices using IGB_UIO driver
====================================
0000:02:06.0 '82545EM Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Copper)' drv=igb_uio
unused=e1000
Network devices using kernel driver
===================================
0000:02:01.0 '79c970 [PCnet32 LANCE]' if=eth1 drv=pcnet32 unused= *Active*
Other network devices
=====================
<none>
# lspci -vt
-[0000:00]-+-00.0 Intel Corporation 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge
+-01.0-[01]--
+-07.0 Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA
+-07.1 Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE
+-07.3 Intel Corporation 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI
+-07.7 VMware Virtual Machine Communication Interface
+-0f.0 VMware SVGA II Adapter
+-10.0 LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X Fusion-MPT Dual
Ultra320 SCSI
+-11.0-[02]--+-00.0 VMware USB1.1 UHCI Controller
| +-01.0 Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] 79c970
[PCnet32 LANCE]
| +-02.0 Ensoniq ES1371 [AudioPCI-97]
| +-03.0 VMware USB2 EHCI Controller
| +-05.0 VMware Device 07e0
| \-06.0 Intel Corporation 82545EM Gigabit Ethernet
Controller (Copper)
+-15.0-[03]--
+-15.1-[04]--
+-15.2-[05]--
+-15.3-[06]--
+-15.4-[07]--
+-15.5-[08]--
+-15.6-[09]--
+-15.7-[0a]--
+-16.0-[0b]--
+-16.1-[0c]--
+-16.2-[0d]--
+-16.3-[0e]--
+-16.4-[0f]--
+-16.5-[10]--
+-16.6-[11]--
+-16.7-[12]--
+-17.0-[13]--
+-17.1-[14]--
+-17.2-[15]--
+-17.3-[16]--
+-17.4-[17]--
+-17.5-[18]--
+-17.6-[19]--
+-17.7-[1a]--
+-18.0-[1b]--
+-18.1-[1c]--
+-18.2-[1d]--
+-18.3-[1e]--
+-18.4-[1f]--
+-18.5-[20]--
+-18.6-[21]--
\-18.7-[22]--
Regards
Jyotiswarup
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Cyril Cressent <cyril.cressent@intel.com>wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:01:06PM +0530, Jyotiswarup Raiturkar wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the quick reply. I saw some definitions of e1000_phy_82579
> hence
> > I thought (hoped) the NIC would be supported. I will try to run my dpdk
> app
> > inside a VM with an emulated e1000 NIC (just to test the code ..).
>
> As a general rule, even if you find references to a NIC in the poll mode
> drivers, if it's not listed in
> lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h
> then consider the NIC as not supported.
>
> Good luck with the VM,
>
> Cyril
>