From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f50.google.com (mail-lf0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A4EF94 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:04:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f50.google.com with SMTP id h129so3735019lfh.1 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:04:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Cn04YF/3/2tn3mTlQ6f0GnAB5gUgQW/MEEvqi293dGY=; b=m3CUSoct4hvNee8ljTwepYysksUdOmFe+3KY+BC9fDkxnB4G3fOsoSRRCmLtp0YxEL 8aX887cFnHexjMniYBupWZCbrPohhTlhg9+WfUFGKLOdBpyK+wuAMXLfTB0X+WBtuLGt C6JvevkvxoY+87FCfcbLRhYS28zeEjLI2mTA4NWfT+RLNVJ8+Dw4NPGPKMtHD1HyQHUZ rV0c8rQ6GNDx2hoRlTjHpKQiYTJI5d4QeJ/xp1gjSoAJXOB0cyN+2nyS5dRfx611LtQl FsnZEkPSyUQVsXzYBuH4Z6pipJPOke1K0QyzbKv68LvJFnFbui+w31MepRKLb7L6SLLW tK1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Cn04YF/3/2tn3mTlQ6f0GnAB5gUgQW/MEEvqi293dGY=; b=TeOe4z5lskVldK+fSNoF+CFF8tf/AUq60GoSrAGTh4VxEakOBfnIJpKUE/ttJKHoUZ hgWHU9IlnzKGxfpHw27+zfJbtVENlYa7bXUxiFspVzOtsmlHDS8XgiG0lqR4TI6U4U9d POOfv/QvgJ0VfuVYYYGpPZmfJiz2YZB1u4w406xC0qJv8YRuJ2SFAFDcaHop8tj2ViOX F2/XCcfEONSlyFtRsabDtxdkK5wiZO5CI0u8icB6FhW9dgUPTaV3Cuqcvo2XJl82P4cC SgSfJ2KeEodSXudapX/RiqNx6M0htm2ihM8ENRpAvCG7Oc2+1hgXZvPtSDuRL2LqvmEl MqCA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKflg0x3MQQxwtOMvAhv5v40IOuMkdgz+YGF/+nMXDGNRmpBMqnmm16aaNHKkMUzCDTw6mZVFdA72CxgA== X-Received: by 10.25.31.9 with SMTP id f9mr165094lff.34.1468303458244; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:04:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.25.195 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:04:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09090348F7DF@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: Garik E Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 09:04:17 +0300 Message-ID: To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] No RX frames on Intel 82599 VF X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 06:04:18 -0000 On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Garik E wrote: > Hi, > > On the S2600WT2 server, when DPDK is bound to VF, there is no incoming > traffic. > But when the same VF is bound to ixgbevf driver and configured as Linux > interface, > it works normally. I was able to run ping and ssh through that VF. > So my guess is that the RX issue is not due to malfunction hardware. > > The same binary works correctly on S2600WTTR server with 82599 VF > I also tested the application with Mellanox ConnectX-4 on both servers > There were no issues with CX-4 PF and VF > > For some reason DPDK 82599 VF RX functionality does not work on S2600WT2. > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote: > >> Hi Garik, >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Garik E >> > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 2:22 AM >> > To: dev@dpdk.org >> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] No RX frames on Intel 82599 VF >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > >> > I have two Intel servers S2600WTTR and S2600WT2 both with 82599 10G >> > Ethernet Controllers >> > >> > I run the same DPDK application on both servers. >> > >> > The application works with one interface bound to physical or virtual >> PCI >> > function depending on configuration >> > >> > The S2600WTTR server receives incoming traffic on physical and virtual >> > functions >> S2600WTTR is working right? >> >> > >> > The S2600WT2 server receives traffic only on physical function >> > >> > When I bind S2600WT2 VF to ixgbevf driver and configure it as Linux ETH >> > interface, it works normally. >> Don't understand what you're doing here. And you say *works*? Is S2600WT2 >> the one not working? >> >> > >> > >> > Network sniffer shows that Ethernet frames arrive to S2600WT2 port and >> > frames are valid, >> > >> > however DPDK does not receive them. >> > >> > >> > Where can I start to debug this issue ? >> > >> > >> > OS: RHEL 6.6 x86-64 >> > >> > DPDK: 16-07-rc1 >> > >