From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8192345A3A; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:39:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4F34067E; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:39:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oo1-f54.google.com (mail-oo1-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488B840672 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 18:39:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oo1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5dfad5a9c21so689553eaf.0 for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:39:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1727368789; x=1727973589; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Jwj+Fu6Xio+/XfBdQQ+q0x2seabw9XA7sKAqVbvQj7w=; b=AYLslXs5qL/ewdnnvbUVoTM1sxvNB6MgC5X4REOMFGpRW35fIKsczdIY9gnGCitHw3 eKbCpcklFO6eV6amx+P7yxhMpXb+G/K4jKQ2XBQX8c2jwGp5BWdrZE5Xl2UMiy49rQFR cEgCXXVXrRNaZfZ5XRtmC9sL6kG/nGEcFZ5Pg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727368789; x=1727973589; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Jwj+Fu6Xio+/XfBdQQ+q0x2seabw9XA7sKAqVbvQj7w=; b=HzxFBsJVmouNpIsv575KPpsdLveCrcXB+2DyMssc9TnoDYPi2u4IdOjY88u2vHJAE0 f3bIM+tYU8aSc7u6c6a9F4A5COrKG6+h2oiw5gmVLtN0pzbqMGyA0Cy/NplTFnBpyou8 T9citqhtGBAFbHf01exZS8TW08+p00c96/V+8kah0Hu4I86vhjGjIczqoMbFtVHfWf4h BaaYFKHxsHNcJ93UKIYuU+LgVDG74eIRUdfTNjiLmNwRqHYROnKRTS75Od4Qg38RZ/R/ e8LV8ijchaczBuhGuidMbTO/UebQOu8gB5snXhgU/IkSi3TCFGy3tJvW4TQjTrNGtaA9 LidQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxVQe+SzvMwN+gOjxDZC9zlyoaBgi6nS7tjGXsnPpYEH5QRltOD abQS8q/8CU/c92CIxeJltSmQoH2LTGOSSc6tzzZbp0OtxJxpj3EtO9yDL3nD30R+SeTQgl3sS0N yw3ueI7oyzGCJWzYpy4LPndpYjeAFd0Po8zZ77Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG9ktXDe1kHvirSv4JWRO3AQnDjfB7FYzkrT+gv/uRaYr3V9HV+E/6kKnxoaar+FkIEf3oHoFXPtxCFF3c2+nA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:61e:b0:5c4:144b:1ff9 with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5e7727c46fdmr13614eaf.5.1727368789557; Thu, 26 Sep 2024 09:39:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240925140021.46320-2-rjarry@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240925140021.46320-2-rjarry@redhat.com> From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2024 12:38:44 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH dpdk] mbuf: fix strict aliasing error in allocator To: Robin Jarry Cc: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000019216106230863eb" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --00000000000019216106230863eb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Recheck-request: iol-mellanox-Performance When I enabled this test on Monday I accidentally set the delta threshold to 1.5% instead of 5%. So the accepted results window was too small and led to this false positive test fail. --00000000000019216106230863eb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Recheck-request:=C2=A0iol-mellanox-Performance

When I enabled this test on Monday I accidentally set the delta thr= eshold to 1.5% instead of 5%. So the accepted results window was too small = and led to this false positive test fail.
--00000000000019216106230863eb--