From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C2B43CBC; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:25:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF04A42E6B; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:25:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-oo1-f51.google.com (mail-oo1-f51.google.com [209.85.161.51]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C1D402C9 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:25:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oo1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5a46b28a77dso1104584eaf.1 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:25:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1710527155; x=1711131955; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=olT6nBOunk5rycOjqAsxG35FRmmrTSkuvRA6/lUmXE8=; b=JFXu2wDJ19IR8gvd9rJqf2RaKLPEk5n2t3QdSkh5OFJWvaPsJCltYiy9UzXdGMyq14 gZxJLnutAi6HBpYA7OUPVCCecPL3/zRePB+vBOIIaPQl9o9cm0K/Gp9pPzVyuZNac+Y+ TyyRwVuWb9ItWUclLCnI9RYu0Iyr7sxOWBc/4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710527155; x=1711131955; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=olT6nBOunk5rycOjqAsxG35FRmmrTSkuvRA6/lUmXE8=; b=n7Fq6woPJ07W6FwwpkdGI4ZRNEwOw/TjGbTP2CbdcsWuqAd+iIgXU0+NZWQRsANM6W 1qgoiGcA2PfqwB8ixt7krIYwXHkXNRBJUNoagyqwGBEir9cVBJKF6QNVNSdYseLSh7xf lMKPXu+EoIq8PfYiQHkck8gKiSo3EDKv8wf4MrINUAmJkPeA/DEA2XxHtTzY/0hnrJE6 PgcGWxoQlsN7wewNiOy9Hgpymvzlo6r76uOWgIHQlcy3sSaDTFeKPReOk+B5K+n3Oty2 ovueQxb1IO7NycOyrfgGlW14Y4Tb6ZobYqVlzSmuDpzjzQXYbJy+ZZXYRV+mOUa/SimU bWKg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXDwpeGwm+EYuw+ygSDnKZeg+zVrWYlkaTmSMggW1hmXiwdG2DHmP7h6T2x+DiGVFTJR0GToCi7/jSNVPM= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy/rWXyxYGVl1hxcmfJSqDrU+nlnfE0Ya1CO5qSljmv3cFI+g9g a1wB+W8RXHs731kEfdtCY/FM0e1V4n5kkJchP6iVtM+V8H5/7WNdes4ux6PK3h1okhwRLCF7+wL TBZVhJZoSzKbkOKlYrAR+VqUyrBy4/Gtjk8Adyw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEWxFUfpfiE+D4kDZm3sGnJlA53RxSSjSkmM/dpqX79CHjxtfI4iA5p8WQhBGkHPEIshaCALC+Uy6E+d+GHFIc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:4308:b0:21f:9f20:31b7 with SMTP id w8-20020a056870430800b0021f9f2031b7mr6144734oah.1.1710527155388; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:25:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231212153640.1561504-1-brian.dooley@intel.com> <20240305174227.1785111-1-brian.dooley@intel.com> <20240305174227.1785111-4-brian.dooley@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20240305174227.1785111-4-brian.dooley@intel.com> From: Patrick Robb Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 14:25:44 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] crypto/ipsec_mb: unified IPsec MB interface To: Brian Dooley Cc: Kai Ji , Pablo de Lara , dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com, Ciara Power , Wathsala Vithanage Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Recheck-request: iol-unit-arm64-testing Even though ipsec update is postponed to a later release, I'm putting in rechecks for all series that have fails for the arm crypto tests now that we are building from SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.12.