From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C793844120; Fri, 31 May 2024 23:22:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9750B427D8; Fri, 31 May 2024 23:22:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oo1-f45.google.com (mail-oo1-f45.google.com [209.85.161.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D57402D0 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 23:22:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oo1-f45.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5ba090b0336so618040eaf.1 for ; Fri, 31 May 2024 14:22:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1717190571; x=1717795371; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XWApihmHNDfEYBbGgRrPVYnxcAfc4RDMZyR9ScUPDh4=; b=cfFJPaA5WbjzCzraxZc8ipKpClKf3+XnjcBCexcVdohvLeHw0kib+EIEC/m9WvK6Pi j67CFCx09G3pgKlY9TTB5WGV4//x1qh25FKNMOzkHGZptnrZ1hs4h1dLH6neF3TavYvX KylDQPMjyBO4f2ftfyMZMVY2lBvThgn2SwAgA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1717190571; x=1717795371; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=XWApihmHNDfEYBbGgRrPVYnxcAfc4RDMZyR9ScUPDh4=; b=o/CtpmltGDNvOs0E6lsx5xTHmV+/sSeKqlo7Z8fUszwzCvjNMiVH2qTKmYf+qVi5xK fu0v4oOyYZsrF0iuhGvX2fp55gkFABdzCbKyDlJEoUPPie/RNCklW7Y1oyPQUEStm/f2 Iu5k3+VeDC31R3/nQhWHa0/NRlPo42devQcgAl2G2nHb+HMBYeWXTEyXTjW0h6tyilgX QG35j00MhOqHK1PCxRjei6Sy1fe9yJME04MwynzYqMARf3srXnADQVY/Qdfglo17qmbA 2CPiqbvAOVbit7k+HPjxEmMKfuoWNTYgsS1lLQ1fYbVoGGZ7J1FwS5+ML1CA7+Ei7DNa 4vhw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yylnphp0sludnULFEqLfCpFxTLRuQmtp7xB2HUMykIIHeW2J1O0 7QNuXYcBVJENlfIFF8cdwnlMjaDRfi8paWaXAoagnsWclR/e22TdDUPGwYAnDjRvVCk5ewP6JC0 Py3UECpjZEYsJ67EnoMkC2aW6oOsb/Ozt+VXuMA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFbc4BApkbWSsqHrUIGubmt59jzfz2eMcTH4v4P4YvhD7S2eSW0H9vfM+6cCiaIq3wkTB0avSE8SznvcnbSnzY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:1508:b0:5b9:d3a0:dcdf with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5ba05cd3275mr2724963eaf.7.1717190570571; Fri, 31 May 2024 14:22:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F4B8@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F4CE@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F4CE@smartserver.smartshare.dk> From: Patrick Robb Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 17:22:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Depends-on To: Aaron Conole Cc: dev@dpdk.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= , "NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f8932e0619c69563" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000f8932e0619c69563 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, Found my way to this thread based on the CI testing call yesterday, as I am about to put together the blurb for the dpdk website testing page that documents support (or lack thereof) for depends-on in CI. On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:40=E2=80=AFAM Morten Br=C3=B8rup wrote: > > From: Aaron Conole [mailto:aconole@redhat.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 16.34 > > > > > I'll try to spend some time and add patch based support, but I think > > there was some weird tricky stuff going on. > > Series support suffices for this patch, so figuring out what is wrong wit= h > that will make me happy. :-) > > It probably doesn't make sense to add depends on individual patch support, as the PW maintainer and Thomas agreed on depends on series support only going forward. https://github.com/getpatchwork/git-pw/issues/71#issuecomment-1938927101 --000000000000f8932e0619c69563 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi all,

Found my way to this thread based on the CI testing call yesterday= , as I am about to put together the blurb for the dpdk website testing page= that documents support (or lack thereof) for depends-on in CI.=C2=A0
=

= On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 10:40=E2=80=AFAM Morten Br=C3=B8rup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
> From: Aaron C= onole [mailto:acono= le@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2024 16.34

>
> I'll try to spend some time and add patch based support, but I thi= nk
> there was some weird tricky stuff going on.

Series support suffices for this patch, so figuring out what is wrong with = that will make me happy. :-)


It probably doesn't make sense to = add depends on individual patch support, as the PW maintainer and Thomas ag= reed on depends on series support only going forward.=C2=A0
--000000000000f8932e0619c69563--