DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: How does CI system get updated?
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2024 12:34:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJvnSUB+rh=8-j5QWFB1OLFQ_iD_vng+9ZjDqpg-8uhWEi1exg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJvnSUBns79hAz9Kxpb1s996Rf7k=e=AGgNq2e3GcgFj4EkZBQ@mail.gmail.com>

Okay I understand better now how we ended up with an older mingw64
version. The DPDK Docs for windows compile direct folks over to
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/) to get the
prebuilt binaries, but the latest toolchain published there is Mingw64
v8.*, whereas the current version is v11.*. So, when we upgraded to
the "latest" published version, we upgraded to that v8.* from years
ago. If you look at the mingw64 website downloads page
(https://www.mingw-w64.org/downloads/), it directs people over to
winlibs.com to download the prebuilt binaries for v11.

I have replaced the Windows Server 2019 CI VM's old mingw64 binaries
with the new (v11.*) ones downloaded from winlibs.com, and I see that
Stephen's patch now passes the compile test. I can issue a retest for
your series once I am all done making the update for the server 2022
machine too.

I guess this also raises the question of whether the DPDK docs for the
windows mingw64 compile process should be updated to point to
winlibs.com instead of sourceforge.net (only has the source code).

https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/windows_gsg/build_dpdk.html#option-2-mingw-w64-toolchain

On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 3:06 PM Patrick Robb <probb@iol.unh.edu> wrote:
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> This is a UNH Lab system.
>
> We review our systems for updates once every 4 months. The idea is we
> do it early in each DPDK release's development cycle. So, we update
> Dockerfiles (for container environments), we apply updates where
> needed to persistent systems (for VMs, or baremetal servers).
> Obviously the Mingw version for the windows system was a check we have
> not been doing. Thank you for spotting this and letting us know.
>
> We will apply the update and let you know when it's ready.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 11:03 AM Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > This warning is due to a very old version of Mingw installed in CI system.
> >
> > ==== 20 line log output for Windows Server 2019 (dpdk_mingw64_compile): ====
> > In file included from ..\lib\net/rte_ip.h:21,
> > from ../lib/net/rte_dissect.c:20:
> > C:/mingw64/mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/ws2tcpip.h:447:63: note: expected 'PVOID' {aka 'void *'} but argument is of type 'const uint8_t *' {aka 'const unsigned char *'}
> > WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE LPCSTR WSAAPI InetNtopA(INT Family, PVOID pAddr, LPSTR pStringBuf, size_t StringBufSize);
> > ~~~~~~^~~~~
> > ../lib/net/rte_dissect.c:292:29: error: passing argument 2 of 'inet_ntop' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
> > inet_ntop(AF_INET6, ip6_hdr->dst_addr, dbuf, sizeof(dbuf));
> > ~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
> > In file included from ..\lib\net/rte_ip.h:21,
> > from ../lib/net/rte_dissect.c:20:
> > C:/mingw64/mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/ws2tcpip.h:447:63: note: expected 'PVOID' {aka 'void *'} but argument is of type 'const uint8_t *' {aka 'const unsigned char *'}
> > WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE LPCSTR WSAAPI InetNtopA(INT Family, PVOID pAddr, LPSTR pStringBuf, size_t StringBufSize);
> > ~~~~~~^~~~~
> >
> > It was fixed upstream in Mingw 4 years ago.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-26 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-25 14:55 Stephen Hemminger
2024-07-25 19:06 ` Patrick Robb
2024-07-26 16:34   ` Patrick Robb [this message]
2024-07-26 17:27     ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJvnSUB+rh=8-j5QWFB1OLFQ_iD_vng+9ZjDqpg-8uhWEi1exg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=probb@iol.unh.edu \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=roretzla@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).