From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904CA45945; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:06:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D3340291; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:06:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f171.google.com (mail-pf1-f171.google.com [209.85.210.171]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B4D4028A for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 17:06:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-718d985b6bbso2694293b3a.2 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 08:06:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1725894387; x=1726499187; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=3m4P6YtfTkew8947EGJv2v+PnTsxc8L0qbunUw6ucdY=; b=dSkbUmxqkaA2ZtazSfgpXb9yFVkO0sf5/39FHuaRH/Krkn5GDyxPHGsR860ZczsQ8z BNYeoFy7iloaeeclC/SdbN2X26OKJKlbw+/XFI/QnrmKQPUH/K0C0g7aZvhZoSzYaLdJ lZbWOx4VEX2GE/u04iY5Hvz0Ggp8W5eE0wpcM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725894387; x=1726499187; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3m4P6YtfTkew8947EGJv2v+PnTsxc8L0qbunUw6ucdY=; b=eCZK45X/JZ7Ex5A0OrvTPho/P0jujKDnPOCdqgHRRG59/DBwldoxj61Q1mHPW6QewL 0LhKV7s1+/PkI1qZlNZnaU1gMWlJaY/NWJFTgf7Y/o/BO4c2Ed667XlR3j6MxonwWJJD rx4QX5MK3JF3zTPZVMvnDms2ThwW4PRQT3KAGoSikuu59nbSapYm/nGwgobDP4Gzs7pV 8zIezQyOMZhq0pgWFV4plVHVfhVxOZEEHCskU9f0q/50cz+xI9t7tOGy0jenIGDBS09O VELi3WokaqIW2MTJJowBX/JKvKphE/AIriJsg8o1KT7aJuiaeB/+llXFdFX1iPHnd4oJ 6D5w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz7opAoZ916I36GWt6yzGzLh7vDPQ5RxdWcI1xzmWAQ3v7oOLnW mPUx/zh1rwmx5ORjZ0tUsyT9RBnGAhaSn1OrO7MZ/2WZIrgrkFaRcTX02CjijIDmMjAsVA9KDbQ N25T+OHBKigtMd4oXVEhgpoaCT4ptm0byro5Jtw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGVNqQUoSPQD3sg0MGZnKQwGD8VurPsiWItXdkERT8nlN2LqP4Dbqoh4xi1j89xzmXnnexoV5kmGPaxgC1ibbc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:4b04:b0:706:74be:686e with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-718d5f61184mr9989663b3a.26.1725894386989; Mon, 09 Sep 2024 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240806125140.2582859-1-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20240806125140.2582859-1-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> From: Patrick Robb Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 11:05:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] dts: add l2fwd test suite To: Luca Vizzarro Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jeremy Spewock , =?UTF-8?Q?Juraj_Linke=C5=A1?= , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Paul Szczepanek Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Reviewed-by: Patrick Robb Tested-by: Patrick Robb Ran on a Broadcom 57414 2x25G NIC on an Intel x86 server. I'll follow up with a review on the pktgen and testpmd changes series as obviously we want to move that to next-dts. Thanks! On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 8:53=E2=80=AFAM Luca Vizzarro wrote: > + def test_l2fwd_integrity(self) -> None: > + """Test the L2 forwarding integrity. > + > + Test: > + Configure a testpmd shell with a different numbers of queues= per run. Start up L2 > + forwarding, send random packets from the TG and verify they = were all received back. > + """ > + queues =3D [1, 2, 4, 8] The only question I had was whether we need a show port info capability check to verify the max queues per port is at least 8, but I think that 8 is so low that we will not realistically run into this problem, after a quick 60 second check on a couple NICs.