From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB62145562; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:28:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B343A42D89; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:28:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oa1-f41.google.com (mail-oa1-f41.google.com [209.85.160.41]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6540427B8 for ; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 17:28:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oa1-f41.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-25cba5eea69so2589779fac.2 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:28:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1720020494; x=1720625294; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=m1MWczAOOzg6z9dOjo3L03A5Ahg4TXCkC3oJMoc5YSQ=; b=IyYsaHO1PDnjl8TihndvmuC4Y/YqzCHtSBj4FWwibD1a6dMOZlKSULYd8onCycVIk3 4VjGtSYNV2lF3gzUYLf+XpIhU+1ytDvj6izQySyNbOmXPtgRQccel38U9EK7HS3Zs8pO EA7VnGPSmZM/StmakzTnt/zaaaEvJdBFfcGx4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720020494; x=1720625294; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=m1MWczAOOzg6z9dOjo3L03A5Ahg4TXCkC3oJMoc5YSQ=; b=E3wwoxEn3GQJF+dmiiueAsf1JIakt2MX6It6pgTfUxdvB8OVNLpY/icPNHA/ru+DFb jbyGxDExZ6oML5CO87gwKbF8Z/bKI6oCYY4n/U8T64fuNlP5gaJF4ivgzOBZNVInUy5P ioXlKtROhkGzP2yKnUlhj9KYAvcedgzFEmwgv7AbwHrTMlqKvkmwHaDzffX6mzCcom4h MVi4i4Xdx/URJqXRqg5eS4LxghtmgzRtwdT4uqOuXLsh9JZw/o6aIrojmgjqeM8ZvZxl EqW6bQ0umXTtr4gOS5K/4/RcJo8ZJqaZ/tmopKkpIN/QM198Waawn0lm4lo8CTjxDLMy qg/A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXGINwv3MUPnz95SGDeBlvFVD5UgixoVP9H6JmrfsQJL8HkS4SdTjUkrdW5k9NpbVp7LqwqrhaB9xhO1As= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx8DupIzCQ4twF5B2fKdaCWHk7Fn0B1BNnu9peyrb5lH4OUuFHv ZRrTFY/wGy9NJ6FdHu/XZ4qlRrOX7TZgb7bM8sFQT/W6zrMcaZl4bkR/I+Dnd0rc6/vkO7jWsUk IauFTUGqvqnladsKXBJTAYgCK72qLqfUKoqj8qg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGf8SCbm4YCdava1ZiGGxZEMZuILFjFKtM1fwgWPvdM9HUBqVZ7FpxUIDlKYr72YP6js3eeuT7m6qHLhcGmqKM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:2194:b0:254:ae58:c8de with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-25db35db25bmr10861978fac.45.1720020493827; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 08:28:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1710970416-27841-1-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com> <4023574.2iPT33SAM4@thomas> <2845507.vgeOAicOrc@thomas> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F594@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 11:28:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mempool: use rte constant macro instead of GCC builtin To: David Marchand Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= , Thomas Monjalon , Tyler Retzlaff , dev@dpdk.org, Andrew Rybchenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, Jul 3, 2024 at 10:22=E2=80=AFAM David Marchand wrote: > > > > From the discussions on the retest mechanism, I understand we need to > ask for a rebase. > I sent a new retest. Let's see... > Hi, That makes sense that we need to re-apply on the latest mainline and retest. But, the "rebase" feature for rechecks which you are referring to is still in development. So, unfortunately your request won't work with the automated system - it's just going to recheck from the DPDK artifact created in March when Tyler originally submitted the series. For now, I can manually trigger a job in our CI platform which will re-apply Tyler's patch to the up to date tree, and rerun all testing. Thanks!