From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF51743C4F; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 04:57:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1D440269; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 04:57:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f182.google.com (mail-pg1-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B3440156 for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2024 04:57:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f182.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5dbf7b74402so4990367a12.0 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 19:57:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1709697462; x=1710302262; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=zePgm0yKUHKXGsoSugE5sZQtFmSWhUsdAx5T5M4GLlM=; b=CdDEsAd9crfyAM58ECBzMh4rOW/clcwQym6VmHrUswD2IU5rKqmZqfaScVTZwlIFdK 0+sN7LauW+139GbdrNKRq3Cu8W5cspyCHNRKVoXK1ADot/ZFtHNmgq/EwygAHHd54Nww 1ralzi+wRRB+1bPUkSPqzb2V2h2O/GgB/D3uc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709697462; x=1710302262; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zePgm0yKUHKXGsoSugE5sZQtFmSWhUsdAx5T5M4GLlM=; b=cWvpYP5BJKtvDuqhuOHt5HSXlSP0D+TarzDGUnJZy3pzhv72K683YjmvjrNrefvi4b YFTtQoB/zUPKoEAEhabCa2OPArgCBgxqQZ4l2BYDIXQV6nfD17O+RPo4Ayy0Cn4KBpho YcNlt9tPZVA8ACd/zYHf3oAN+5znWRzKf48NEvAZNil0FD5Jl52ifpaNxbeNHDnCIqLZ /1VgUmXeG8zzvDsOwZ+QtnY2ghcHwSvZZgvG3MnW3rnou2SS2l2GVitq3+d9dRzMPEI1 gRD6cpa/pIWXpsQkX6hS/mHN4YhJLKE9g25DAbB5FQBH8mTzVRKgSG13n7qWA2w+kjG4 r7wA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW+FdLylapjyE+va0lGYBmZH3IX2ykEBR4+/MMc7x4bi+kiv4KQe4//zA5ujJ8oJN/uG/Wi9Vnlo4nhIzM= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwVHUPw513hal+sRbkoCephS59zIV56hWJ53AAe3B2BytO4t/7P 8q0ZHrWWSJSXxMrK55h2f9dPpWPH3ybeouZyVnRoMoq46EmVXqbCsuXAmQILfNyhOjDAxQ7SG/N efkOZTYferA0IK/j9t/GkFLJVLJFoqpssmcZwsg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHcdK4+RHtqwiPPNAGB6QiqcyG3LVBnR+hTM4vIUr3xZMxsrY5XVULK4+KJsq7XTz5csILhdvMRSRMliuRyGHs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:98f:b0:29b:2d0f:a94 with SMTP id 15-20020a17090a098f00b0029b2d0f0a94mr10870706pjo.0.1709697462490; Tue, 05 Mar 2024 19:57:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20231212153640.1561504-1-brian.dooley@intel.com> <20240305174227.1785111-1-brian.dooley@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 22:57:31 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v5 1/4] crypto/ipsec_mb: bump minimum IPsec Multi-buffer version To: Akhil Goyal Cc: Brian Dooley , Kai Ji , Pablo de Lara , Aaron Conole , "dev@dpdk.org" , Sivaramakrishnan Venkat , Ciara Power , Wathsala Vithanage , "thomas@monjalon.net" , David Marchand Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 6:30=E2=80=AFPM Patrick Robb wro= te: > > Recheck-request: iol-unit-arm64-testing https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2024-March/601582.html Hello. I wanted to flag this as still failing on arm after running the testing using the new tag Wathsala published today. We did it via a debian 12 container image which we rebuilt today with all the ipsec dependencies and arm ipsec install. We simply: git clone --depth 1 --branch SECLIB-IPSEC-2024.03.05 https://git.gitlab.arm.com/arm-reference-solutions/ipsec-mb.git make -j $(nproc) make install then build DPDK. Wathsala, what do you think? Might I be missing something here?