From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52152455E4; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 17:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F6F402A9; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 17:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oo1-f42.google.com (mail-oo1-f42.google.com [209.85.161.42]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC0A4025C for ; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 17:26:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oo1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5c66ffadb7aso1365501eaf.1 for ; Tue, 09 Jul 2024 08:26:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1720538775; x=1721143575; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Wqa3/ndG6PVZy+JgBVrOHCjIVs++CAjqK7RQSvVveNw=; b=IX0UOpfw60LkM6UkxLY9BlI/xBy6YVd4MbMaAOqcBBrMFanf8gD7wHJZb9htFJaxKH Iqd/fhpJSendnu/6aekpE7rwGxFr6QCTZyO85oAw951dy3kaYbfZ9Jy2xGndfeFE9IyW HgIfi8zBiqMH6S3vK+mLnE0qyAtyISsX/v460= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1720538775; x=1721143575; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Wqa3/ndG6PVZy+JgBVrOHCjIVs++CAjqK7RQSvVveNw=; b=f07gp88W/UHuBUonXaWx/2S2b+I3iwWL0NYek+92g3IF0yPUg/uBUKAs+aklNC6KrE s2cOvFWvoYoogJq2RRBIl2jnQPFbmtoxejcbk22PcjozcEAgZS8rCnGZpgSPJ9nQgc0V StEr8vIJXfpg/FkgfJafW39dks+yb9BVjbwgeouMYBSsx/sjML0k41z4Uxz6HNzCcdk9 QbLLBH0/t9/V+zXXuAHuUN74xim94eRN8qbYVFx2GUIeEDcyIV4jJ08Wrn19Pd2xk5K2 uTmUfOhMFZmbgl6B9OGzgtgD5oEpKLp+tS/58KlwWFYpdKdeq5SxYo38ku0efPsvVmO0 7+hA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXJeVWFguxNL3MAw3XXazTVXdz0fC1AFZA2u+6P73tb8gdVN693DQGdomOGGqa4HZKBfY7FtSuhu+ne+/4= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yyrtqn/9B6+DCqksBbZpz1bvOBsnjZuahi1lBhpHc9VXE5QDi9u 9P/DdUx4sz3f8xMu9f94098ZjyrOpNAXrNep9dQjF0STzw1iwEvADPOqn4j7zry+l7gywP2CCtU 1ApRKT/JR6TNhhv4xoM+5V2h1ZeIyIw2yxjCpcg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFm1zeuL3tx7DWn+IgwrCoMVxhf8dYO6ACvxXEsTZvLnEypP1kv1BBCm+aWvN0o5sIQHnJAqkDkPc7dX/Al7HI= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:aa4e:0:b0:5c2:ac6:935f with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5c68e4a4453mr2920178eaf.9.1720538774929; Tue, 09 Jul 2024 08:26:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240302234812.9137-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com> <20240530154100.25811-1-mb@smartsharesystems.com> <99e4a1ac2166451dab7033e2181a0821@huawei.com> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35E9F5A4@smartserver.smartshare.dk> In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 11:26:04 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] eal/x86: improve rte_memcpy const size 16 performance To: David Marchand Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= , Konstantin Ananyev , bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru, stephen@networkplumber.org, roretzla@linux.microsoft.com, mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com, aconole@redhat.com, dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 8:48=E2=80=AFAM David Marchand wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 2:43=E2=80=AFPM Morten Br=C3=B8rup wrote: > > PS: The CI should catch this stuff. > > Restoring OVS tests in CI has been requested and I think it was being wor= ked on. > Not sure where we are atm, Patrick? > OvS and SPDK compile jobs were added about a month ago. So, Morten's series should be getting flagged for OVS fails. An example from a series which already has CI finished: https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2024-July/728503.html