Hi Sameer, Thanks for the heads up. It looks like the Github Robot has a failure but I think it is a spurious false fail, so I just sent a recheck request for that. I expect that failure will be overwritten with a PASS soon. There are also 2 warnings on your patch, which I can address, but they will not preclude your patch from being merged (as they are only a WARN, not a FAIL). Thanks. On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 1:10 PM Sameer Vaze wrote: > > Hey Patrick > > I followed https://core.dpdk.org/testing/#requesting-a-patch-retest to > request a rebase and recheck since the failures don't seem related to my > changes. It doesn't look like the retests were picked up. Did I miss > something? > > Thanks > Sameer Vaze > ------------------------------ > *From:* Sameer Vaze > *Sent:* Tuesday, October 28, 2025 11:19 AM > *To:* Sunila Sahu ; Fan Zhang ; > Ashish Gupta > *Cc:* dev@dpdk.org > *Subject:* Re: [PATCH] compressdev: fix coverity issue > > > *WARNING:* This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary > of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. > Recheck-request: rebase=main, iol-sample-apps-testing, > iol-compile-amd64-testing > ------------------------------ > *From:* Sameer Vaze > *Sent:* Friday, October 24, 2025 12:47 PM > *To:* Sunila Sahu ; Fan Zhang ; > Ashish Gupta > *Cc:* dev@dpdk.org ; Sameer Vaze > *Subject:* [PATCH] compressdev: fix coverity issue > > Adds missing free before end of function > > Signed-off-by: Sameer Vaze > --- > drivers/compress/zlib/zlib_pmd.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/compress/zlib/zlib_pmd.c > b/drivers/compress/zlib/zlib_pmd.c > index 3a2485b54e..1d7651dd7d 100644 > --- a/drivers/compress/zlib/zlib_pmd.c > +++ b/drivers/compress/zlib/zlib_pmd.c > @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ process_zlib_inflate_chksum(struct rte_comp_op *op, > free(dictionary); > return; > } > + free(dictionary); > } > > static void > -- > 2.31.1 > >