Hey Patrick

I followed https://core.dpdk.org/testing/#requesting-a-patch-retest to request a rebase and recheck since the failures don't seem related to my changes. It doesn't look like the retests were picked up. Did I miss something?

Thanks
Sameer Vaze

---

From: Sameer Vaze <svaze@qti.qualcomm.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2025 11:19 AM
To: Sunila Sahu <ssahu@marvell.com>; Fan Zhang <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>; Ashish Gupta <ashishg@marvell.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] compressdev: fix coverity issue

 

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Recheck-request: rebase=main, iol-sample-apps-testing, iol-compile-amd64-testing

---

From: Sameer Vaze <svaze@qti.qualcomm.com>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2025 12:47 PM
To: Sunila Sahu <ssahu@marvell.com>; Fan Zhang <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>; Ashish Gupta <ashishg@marvell.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>; Sameer Vaze <svaze@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] compressdev: fix coverity issue

 

Adds missing free before end of function

Signed-off-by: Sameer Vaze <svaze@qti.qualcomm.com>
---
 drivers/compress/zlib/zlib_pmd.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/compress/zlib/zlib_pmd.c b/drivers/compress/zlib/zlib_pmd.c
index 3a2485b54e..1d7651dd7d 100644
--- a/drivers/compress/zlib/zlib_pmd.c
+++ b/drivers/compress/zlib/zlib_pmd.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ process_zlib_inflate_chksum(struct rte_comp_op *op,
                 free(dictionary);
                 return;
         }
+       free(dictionary);
 }
 
 static void
--
2.31.1