From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134D64675B; Thu, 15 May 2025 23:04:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E6A410FD; Thu, 15 May 2025 23:04:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pf1-f175.google.com (mail-pf1-f175.google.com [209.85.210.175]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF574410D0 for ; Thu, 15 May 2025 23:04:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf1-f175.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-739b3fe7ce8so1289620b3a.0 for ; Thu, 15 May 2025 14:04:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1747343043; x=1747947843; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9YosoUVA3AMXGmfrrIKB8zMOcWHxBkDHNoH7P64TDPI=; b=d7jWiAUEmXty4NgqeQ4vzucsowiNuIxUsjL8KPiB3ShciF6rJtTpunnHQwSWhZUqkh /xCcT6kvYN3ArjR3/6XyO218FloDRZDpq+WXX2zpdfk970GUCC5Zfex1j9kwB8PqiWAQ u0rdd/XA3rsmXChU+p1KDj+LfEmeXJlroLkxg= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747343043; x=1747947843; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=9YosoUVA3AMXGmfrrIKB8zMOcWHxBkDHNoH7P64TDPI=; b=sy/okFwUWqSVk9vjnphbOhMIsss2/jPXOnsEcBK/uzDzBHvQb0FYgdV5AX6tyS9eNo RhpmaBG4pVJTSzIHjV0I0ZPXoQwO7gbEirUn7RyNVPceSAUlNZ18RLqSjvX6ntSDBni2 IcbGQgtnmmFWJsIhpg8IHZsTPNsxqPn2dELPJDewTxGGiearY/B6/BrRawtIewoXLP+Z GWfnZLbetgfgg552lJLvjvqbN5kvVyHJWm+BwcLBZlL/4avMp1DJWEMVIeKNnu9pmmQc E6JfP8rOmmTIMGXM5XxeFmprqIMTwkTR5jcHHgqP25NONxjYERPYIinLtfjuogGe9mQP Uz9w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXMudsdg0JBsI38KOEri78A6veA2Yr46vnPRyo9Q0KgoK/vQRL8pPTzw6h0gu4enycAsh8=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw/dxpSv6+pbY5wG1kLsTtI6TtWFx+wHC9/4dLyRnPK681nYg4Y 9W3y4XhKaAsL4LBFXv2M5yED9/D7KI7LxG20Cwc7nJVTjHSLfzIiciTxq8barLG4qLh3CI0tgPJ 5yJbCrampIz9USl1lXk8C5apIkd5mjqTs2nGi8qVi2w== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnculsk7ihudVfPG5S36VDKVQNZF+IbR0Yp97snX/KX7fPHJl8vF6BUiacjvw0pg TvF8inwttYMiyf8f4d0Q7o+D/fjTs7uxWUQzt48+KH0f6kQ67sasnq3qQSsmgierBK6ylhORUlK 5AsRd3Qd5gtZjnOF64nNw7NMn0BVFJC/GwGJzJ649Gqr4Pb87m6Y14Tz9fgPRvQzGkdw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGjzTf/UygCl9zynUrjTrQgoX5OpdQCx8tKKDK+yJg8LOmcXcsyWA5hWk9trmM03yXoN0rJReJx/gOg3JjEST0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1988:b0:22e:6cc6:cf77 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-231d45d938cmr10233375ad.53.1747343043491; Thu, 15 May 2025 14:04:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 16:59:20 -0400 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFufa7of8YsQyJeVT5xDFSPe3psdqfHxz-uIHzzIUdy05gzbQ7VFaTISA7A Message-ID: Subject: Re: meson error on ARM Grace server 23.11/22.11 To: Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage Cc: "ci@dpdk.org" , dev , Honnappa Nagarahalli , "stable@dpdk.org" , Doug Foster , nd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000688c6806353301df" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000688c6806353301df Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Wathsala, How can we help on the UNH side? Do you want us to produce the 22.11 and 23.11 diffs/patches, which would be based on d007038, with some modifications based on what you had said to Doug? I'm not sure what the process looks like exactly for providing backports to LTS maintainers. On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:00=E2=80=AFPM Wathsala Wathawana Vithanage < wathsala.vithanage@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > At the DPDK Community Lab we have been running CI tests with a new ARM > > Grace server for the past couple of months on main and next-* branches. > I am > > trying to add LTS runs now, and ran into a snag with 23.11 and 22.11 fo= r > this > > system. Stable maintainers I'm not sure whether this should be addresse= d > or not > > for hardware which is new and didn't exist when 22.11 and 23.11 were > > released... but I figured I'd make the tickets and find out. I attached > the meson > > logs to the tickets and if for whatever reason you guys want to remote > into this > > machine, I'm happy to setup the VPN and SSH access. > > > > 22.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1703 > > 23.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1702 > > +doug > > neoverse-v2 is supported in the GCC 13.3 used for this build although > -mtune/-mcpu > for grace is not available in that version. > Adding neoverse-v2 and soc_grace with crypto extension should bring these > releases > on par with latest. > > > --000000000000688c6806353301df Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Wathsala,

How ca= n we help on the UNH side? Do you want us to produce the 22.11 and 23.11 di= ffs/patches, which would be based on d007038, with some modifications based= on what you had said to Doug?

I'm not sure wh= at the process looks like exactly for providing backports to LTS maintainer= s.

On Tue, Apr 29, 2025 at 12:00=E2=80=AFPM Wath= sala Wathawana Vithanage <= wathsala.vithanage@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the DPDK Community Lab we have been running CI tests with a new ARM=
> Grace server for the past couple of months on main and next-* branches= . I am
> trying to add LTS runs now, and ran into a snag with 23.11 and 22.11 f= or this
> system. Stable maintainers I'm not sure whether this should be add= ressed or not
> for hardware which is new and didn't exist when 22.11 and 23.11 we= re
> released... but I figured I'd make the tickets and find out. I att= ached the meson
> logs to the tickets and if for whatever reason you guys want to remote= into this
> machine, I'm happy to setup the VPN and SSH access.
>
> 22.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1703=
> 23.11: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1702=

+doug

neoverse-v2 is supported in the GCC 13.3 used for this build although -mtun= e/-mcpu
for grace is not available in that version.
Adding neoverse-v2 and soc_grace with crypto extension should bring these r= eleases
on par with latest.


--000000000000688c6806353301df--