From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A65446F35; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:59:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA334065B; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:59:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com (mail-pl1-f173.google.com [209.85.214.173]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92545402D0 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 22:59:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-24b13313b1bso10312435ad.2 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 13:59:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1758229193; x=1758833993; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ht4If8kH+Qzquws89BXs3JfXUPPkvLudzv9VmDarXTE=; b=Lp7fA7Y1Jw7Us6IxFvl3Z2RZV7dr/vT3dwQLsFEYGxud3kQy04UfTr5pqriNAawrAH AAb0f2vTHyvyM3Wo1WUaBXN8fW0YFpb6A8MjdWfoEASpDzL1WC8ffLjq/kjPz13116Kb 0IVbBgh6z9EGIt+8Y6k0KkpYmBClaJt8t60vI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758229193; x=1758833993; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ht4If8kH+Qzquws89BXs3JfXUPPkvLudzv9VmDarXTE=; b=dw3uapUWRv6ZneI9UBhVdmMlGuINYgq7eWPCvFeeEWW9E7RLi8FDxIUshvbKOJjrs2 E7siID6X0qahhEAkzl4iQpFuPrHsrWu3+p8zlk27A6jrbQkkcVwFq6J7JRzL6O2ryegU 3CgWeOAhvbwQMsYu6v3/mv0zuroJcuWzw3i2TKZ45ySvLcUlC5B0R9a9ewUVZomYqy9i z8/3JMnBuabjA0WBbyUE/rJ4L3VE9Ga9H5k5r8+eZim7VhP9ug1WuoiRm/w1lGqE0YCN cxEq43OeHeweMgGuqeIECoxIPXYiqWcGdI3ib6sbTn161Zm2Aa0ztPU+jNGsVxKMQVJt fSsA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUNMwHqfAPJCZVl18LW2Oous0NP8GpvrBvrwU5h9yCDqduwl9JMmmrjwxNNSNTIq2lBukw=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy66j2jFkbCENECLp9iavZRMPxiX60dvymoqzdmNmntdEI6GxBe dg7nJ/4QD1ADGFLtlkF5tPFZ448hJSNziwmPpHULg2Tsc7yh8ZJeKOTY6zAdiojtmSYqDmWci/p bncEMBZTsZtdY1YH+hEMeWKEBVslAFrzaOWgLK6uetf0WUX5dqFJ72us= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnct3bUq4zultUCWFypsbd3fao9LPF/bm20ViT93S7DaMmtfFrCuHXx4ZjKB/rC/ YiVNhB1P/LaWrCqBUahUsQSadPc0KpOfyNR3S1OU1SIAECpLZ6e7wVos1WvLodCymJ5wxModBxj m18UnDugdiWSpXVsuS1+qIBGRHJsdIY1n7+PWQbUSjh894lobOXIJwofhMjVFguKkqYHHipf7is LDfIt+8lmlj8wlVkIPRUvFb2UJ0aqmB4QffZ4HdJQqbdu9IQYTMAfp8hLw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGaKCkEzS44MWb3Xsk7xYy6pgUMGtP4cdRmuUIStvAWr+yZL5UJ3FeFKr11L0PnjADbJ9UNRDuG7aFaDlhJXnY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:3850:b0:269:936c:88da with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-269ba53910bmr11696885ad.41.1758229192605; Thu, 18 Sep 2025 13:59:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250908163456.420268-1-shperetz@nvidia.com> <3107280.irdbgypaU6@thomas> In-Reply-To: <3107280.irdbgypaU6@thomas> From: Patrick Robb Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 16:59:36 -0400 X-Gm-Features: AS18NWA3g8erBA57pkCXh19EO5f-Gb4tsqFacPBkMfcyuRPVyfP0A-vtl70EUxM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal: fix DMA mask validation inconsistency in IOVA VA To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Shani Peretz , dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007592ce063f19a275" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000007592ce063f19a275 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Thomas, FYI the recheck you submitted is for Shani's v1 patch. The recheck pipeline picked up your request and is not running a recheck because the patch state is superseded (which blocks the recheck). If you still want a recheck on the v1, I will just remove the line in our script which stops the recheck is the series is superseded. It looks like Shani submitted a v2 this morning and all tests are passing: https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20250918064754.6116-1-shperet= z@nvidia.com/ On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 4:49=E2=80=AFAM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Recheck-request: rebase=3Dmain, iol-mellanox-Functional, > iol-compile-amd64-testing, iol-compile-arm64-testing, > iol-unit-amd64-testing, iol-unit-arm64-testing > > > --0000000000007592ce063f19a275 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Thomas,

FYI the recheck you submitte= d is for Shani's v1 patch. The recheck pipeline picked up your request = and is not running a recheck because the patch state is superseded (which b= locks the recheck). If you still want a recheck on the v1, I will just remo= ve the line in our script which stops the recheck is the series is supersed= ed.=C2=A0

It looks like Shani submitted a v2 this = morning and all tests are passing:=C2=A0https://p= atchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20250918064754.6116-1-shperetz@nvidia.= com/=C2=A0

On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 4:49=E2= =80=AFAM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@= monjalon.net> wrote:
Recheck-request: rebase=3Dmain, iol-mellanox-Functional, iol-co= mpile-amd64-testing, iol-compile-arm64-testing, iol-unit-amd64-testing, iol= -unit-arm64-testing


--0000000000007592ce063f19a275--