From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E183045913; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:12:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C8D40DDB; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:12:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oa1-f46.google.com (mail-oa1-f46.google.com [209.85.160.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15895402DE for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 02:12:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oa1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-277e965305dso3250983fac.2 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:12:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; t=1726013570; x=1726618370; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=FmO0krKGXtXZkNPZAgmNkmA4L36XCFBIXctXLmNNdO8=; b=MkuTIaL1Qj0mBDNHd2nRFXGY3B/0AhZFSFo0aDCSxjyySOJx0iavLZlkGVwXskARFE F/e14tXENc4irWjAWw0JBfzNohFA78yWwDRgvo0ROxDEbX5zg8gyvwyVf1p3xS9psUxe 4SmU5Ykspf9FLVZfev5pM81SaflT6YXBrmkkU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1726013570; x=1726618370; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=FmO0krKGXtXZkNPZAgmNkmA4L36XCFBIXctXLmNNdO8=; b=onwPSG+hVEtNLfSjbzVFHNgoURn3jFgb/I0eYSP3m3SKrrq+JadWxzhHzjvUDcE6OF LV/GguFgHkGypCdsozspsVDdW1fR1DMqw4P/OXNDREmslHUa3vTk+ahjS0I4DcrdIGEC 9o4+4uSCfiLiEHkmL7cJMpBVaFvj9NqU83ImyD81XF5i8u1Ei40sG7SL1dpupf7YCvb3 v7WXDHAuHYJHeI5Efq2pArEor5dhDIFk8akK2QYp/YKqlh9HNRc/+htNOrOwUacxnmTl OPUrwX7FYpIF8NaaygYXCabVhf0q4Qu194VfXt+qe9NpgqoylpGyQy08o54WCX+v0DoJ P21w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzWrp8rhYrOAt9oS8QSVIKEpwDD76RAgZmjW3UjZ81CJZ4N8kdZ Fm/772bpl1PkwNtkjekuZ1VtH//Ca5OKFIv+/b2PVbQywCwiZIQucv9n70EhHRLfHVuTIKINjTp +0Ct61TwaOaEqEYw83f4U3EJsegzJCtfVnzT95Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGT4m7S4K+R4/MRPQCv4DhS1IlqNo4hWksOpqlqgsTJKrKClnxGNgvKmofVmF9buA7lesHlOTA3lrGBGaEjYXw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:d1c1:b0:277:c69b:4099 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-27b82e879ffmr12339354fac.23.1726013570269; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 17:12:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240625123611.1474204-1-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> <20240625123611.1474204-3-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20240625123611.1474204-3-luca.vizzarro@arm.com> From: Patrick Robb Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:12:01 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dts: add blocklist test suite To: Luca Vizzarro Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Paul Szczepanek Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Barring a couple updates needed due to framework changes, this looks good and runs on a Broadcom 975908 25G NIC I used for testing. It runs fine after switching to invoking the testpmd shell via the context manager, and removing the use of "testpmd.close()." Once a new version is submitted with these changes, in my opinion it makes sense to move this series to next-dts. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Patrick Robb Tested-by: Patrick Robb