From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D221DC41A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:06:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wguu7 with SMTP id u7so143968293wgu.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=mHHYkM4cluH6ntXCkUn7ypMEaDDQ8Ons9ibKiigQwy0=;
 b=RP2ahPeFxvlcHuPJusnIb9rTvSyWqqD8FMtkDlvx68L6eQUr6I/qfawT80hlVosQy8
 VHdr0KvhjmOD3x8Jyfk2LkQWxRwgi4bTDPTjQ01oI0xvy+P0sy5/PxXYoi1S6Go8SwKo
 7jP6iCzfUXjJUCw4guH4fJWWozGJ5zEBpszM/LFbLYMtykaPJyZRAQ6oeXI2DG8amOWa
 wv69ny9sJ2Jf8l2sMiB9fKzKJeHxpuYVnHbmy22eTmg7uesSOjUvuFQ6IVDW7xGkIZxp
 CgMjdqQJqBtPku8KuBWX76nSPslLgSPn+MslEFFg9pa4EerIcWZXIECpOJz2Cq9SyADw
 /3rQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.109.36 with SMTP id hp4mr31077097wjb.4.1435590407756;
 Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.36.99 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:06:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALgsdbe2-K8buJXz_oQVMaojWaj3G1Z=DHWybn9vRkK7-ZuHJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALgsdbemVaahegO0uhE1dG52PYOxSvCtT-iD9RD2y7PkKus7Cg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKBXKmC3vcMg-QhDaRKh4iu+SPuc8kzwcyruW+-H1mEdvJwz=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALgsdbe2-K8buJXz_oQVMaojWaj3G1Z=DHWybn9vRkK7-ZuHJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:06:47 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKBXKmCCPQ0Mw9hZxDn2aRsCySvZW1GwUOXYr0x0tzbWyhrH1w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Could not achieve wire speed for 40GE with any DPDK
 version on XL710 NIC's
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 15:06:48 -0000

I have not used XL710 or i40e.
I have no opinion for those NICs.

Keunhong.

2015-06-29 15:59 GMT+09:00 Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>:

> Hello!
>
> Lee, thank you so much for sharing your experience! What do you think
> about 40GE version of 82599?
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:35 AM, Keunhong Lee <dlrmsghd@gmail.com> wrote:
> > DISCLAIMER: This information is not verified. This is truly my personal
> > opinion.
> >
> > As I know, intel 82599 is the only 10G NIC which supports line rate with
> > minimum sized packets (64 byte).
> > According to our internal tests, Mellanox's 40G NICs even support less
> than
> > 30Mpps.
> > I think 40 Mpps is the hardware capacity.
> >
> > Keunhong.
> >
> >
> >
> > 2015-06-28 19:34 GMT+09:00 Pavel Odintsov <pavel.odintsov@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >> Hello, folks!
> >>
> >> We have execute bunch of tests for receive data with Intel XL710 40GE
> >> NIC. We want to achieve wire speed on this platform for traffic
> >> capture.
> >>
> >> But we definitely can't do it. We tried with different versions of
> >> DPDK: 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0. And have not success.
> >>
> >> We achieved only 40Mpps and could do more.
> >>
> >> Could anybody help us with this issue? Looks like this NIC's could not
> >> work on wire speed :(
> >>
> >> Platform: Intel Xeon E5 e5 2670 + XL 710.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>