From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <slayercat.subscription@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-yw0-f193.google.com (mail-yw0-f193.google.com
 [209.85.161.193]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E7837AA
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat,  3 Sep 2016 04:05:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yw0-f193.google.com with SMTP id g192so1374252ywh.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 19:05:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=dh8e18xAidcIATHrID0Dg/ftzouUyF8LTbZ/927q19Q=;
 b=QNCv3KKU3amvgpqLpoNE0oLSYDj2cFFF6svRe+iV69j+Ymq9/ISquchvyEFm7OZK2o
 s0nDDSc5oXtgtUd5i0U4bjGwmqts/HFCDm6iuubqKaJlO9s0PNCJ9/KC8ctvJnzFrm88
 dYVn3pKHceVmltc1hM+kDa+kJlskJJVKCjrPxyobH2xRtVWUiaTRFx+Q8oHw58OrYQGB
 n4vfsnPqnTgbMLV/MR+5WeD4sFz3MzI+ehSZ3DLS9rduY4zGO4SX1z81aQlCjrnp2hsc
 8708NS3zT4Cuav23xbpiXh8OQTbwiceLUs8pYo/u6oKwpNHJUzHYW6i9kiLlVSebyE1E
 MR8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=dh8e18xAidcIATHrID0Dg/ftzouUyF8LTbZ/927q19Q=;
 b=l6DYg3G+Q95w81IUhLJLbf7YKF3hkX0KIdtGB0wCi2hwLeXtyd23V2iV2PVDQgJqgH
 ghshq0R4nkfrH2dav1YNZP7Yi6eHehwyPFvT/NuS/gCe5RYRqTyWzJAU5bIoAl7sIsuE
 ju3CtCZmYmOjSd1cRuHSGYaHZX5w59yaxtosTGAbNmNae5XN+q+Ah3MLCJpGUWcnSQNo
 +wH4TxQTFi4pT8SznpCUTUFQLK4k8bpR+uLduo5viO9wMmdhVeSzHodDgmwjCTLwqIu2
 XUVkD0qLyCr4DuE7c921ZY3NdjLljoTGknLwNqTmTm9Uy4xETGYngwMAqH3ud+Ocnq8x
 SEcA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwN2638rVgOfXz5pk+AGn/DoSWd3NZwruHw7Mv3tqDYX9kXHTR8dLs6YbIPtBTilBOdQMyUMf0SX4vG3Yw==
X-Received: by 10.13.215.210 with SMTP id z201mr3891079ywd.108.1472868309611; 
 Fri, 02 Sep 2016 19:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.240.71 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:05:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20160902095143.117482f0@xeon-e3>
References: <1472793906-5699-1-git-send-email-slayercat.subscription@gmail.com>
 <20160902091236.57250d1a@xeon-e3>
 <CAK_yBkNMQHNG-bLci08HHiOSfcy5zAau6m19KJaVtBYNU_xhMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160902095143.117482f0@xeon-e3>
From: Linzhe Lee <slayercat.subscription@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 10:05:09 +0800
Message-ID: <CAK_yBkOtSNXL6=mD8eQRcFhjQ=HioD=FP5v2_nfZkwiuxfdoEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: fix atomic refcnt update
	synchronization
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 02:05:10 -0000

yes,stephen.

my config file here: http://pastebin.com/N0RKGArh

2016-09-03 0:51 GMT+08:00 Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>:
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 00:31:50 +0800
> Linzhe Lee <slayercat.subscription@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for reply, Stephen.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm in x86-64, my cpu is `Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz`.
>>
>>
>>
>> When allocation mbuf in program1, and transfer it to program2 for free
>> via ring, the program1 might meet assert in allocate mbuf sometimes.
>> (`RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 0);`)
>>
>>
>>
>> but when I using gdb to check it, the refcnt field of mbuf is already
>> zero. so I believe the problem came from the cache line problem or
>> incorrect optimization.
>>
>>
>>
>> When apply this patch, the problem seems solved. I'm submitting it for
>> your comments.
>
> Are you sure you have REFCNT_ATOMIC set?