From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <alex@weka.io>
Received: from mail-lb0-f176.google.com (mail-lb0-f176.google.com
 [209.85.217.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8936835
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 11:14:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z11so2003027lbi.21
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 03:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type;
 bh=N9fjyD5gbNYh4mLu4bsY3DiA1altCraobFPfs8yCzNA=;
 b=dVTkoKfYf9Pnls20Q6fYuWx548qEVhoXgCcg6ZOXgVJkperdWpkxl4aqYhwnm6zFxK
 W/QfxHpD3qN2iXKwgQBfCfmuZ8g1hCNw/KDGSW4B/2q09oEx3R2l+bzNvhUBB2WGZXh+
 ZhkxMMxK0pOLw84bte9rOPVqpy7usp2XyQynVZztOWCd4bAl9ARYG4gHc4q+duNLJCO3
 ga+fiNAhp9+OLwCz3Qo7sAdJQS3/wAK/qQGFS4pvX68Z1z40zIDzWkRBEruANnXVqGds
 gh97lYdTKQtQOhubEx7yHTOW+y83jH8YAMr/nn8okR1/UULdXSBRmbETsmxCk+ylI5CC
 t4vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQldSNy0yGy9StcJud0VvqJ5tQytpmFt/jnxcMP451bIY2Os3ey2JYGZRMUVI9PHwvMLLETm
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.36.5 with SMTP id m5mr17682206laj.51.1414664589338; Thu,
 30 Oct 2014 03:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.215.157 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 03:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:23:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKfHP0Up34C7r6SgrdTt+p-yV0bRkoP=hg8MR1P-C6iEg+cX2Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alex Markuze <alex@weka.io>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] segmented recv ixgbevf
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:14:14 -0000

Hi,
I'm seeing an unwanted behaviour in the receive flow of ixgbevf. While
using Jumbo frames and sending 4k+ bytes , the receive side breaks up the
packets into 2K buffers, and I receive 3 mbuffs per packet.

Im setting the .max_rx_pkt_len to 4.5K and the mempoll has 5K sized
elements?

Anything else I'm missing here. The purpose is to have all 4k+ bytes in one
single continuous buffer.

Thanks
Alex.