From: Mohsin Kazmi <mohsin.kazmi14@gmail.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ray.kinsella@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org,
Tomasz Kulasek <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net: prepare the outer ipv4 hdr for checksum
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 10:14:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKkt9++9mJoUOsmVTfZwP-fS651RMyHvDdCHSJgE8om0pB+wzw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNx7MVHMcSzA2ziD@platinum>
Hi Olivier,
Thanks for the review.
Please find the comments inline below:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 3:09 PM Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> wrote:
> Hi Mohsin,
>
> Hope you are fine!
> Please see my comments below.
>
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 01:04:04PM +0200, Mohsin Kazmi wrote:
> > Re: [PATCH v2] net: prepare the outer ipv4 hdr for checksum
>
> I suggest to highlight that it this is the Intel-specific tx-prepare
> function in the commit title. What about:
>
net: fix Intel-specific Tx preparation for outer checksums
>
> I'll update the commit title as suggested.
> Preparation the headers for the hardware offload
> > misses the outer ipv4 checksum offload.
> > It results in bad checksum computed by hardware NIC.
> >
> > This patch fixes the issue by setting the outer ipv4
> > checksum field to 0.
> >
> > Fixes: 4fb7e803eb1a ("ethdev: add Tx preparation")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mohsin Kazmi <mohsin.kazmi14@gmail.com>
> > Acked-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v2:
> > * Update the commit message with Fixes.
> > ---
> > lib/net/rte_net.h | 12 +++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/net/rte_net.h b/lib/net/rte_net.h
> > index 434435ffa2..e47365099e 100644
> > --- a/lib/net/rte_net.h
> > +++ b/lib/net/rte_net.h
> > @@ -128,8 +128,18 @@ rte_net_intel_cksum_flags_prepare(struct rte_mbuf
> *m, uint64_t ol_flags)
> > if (!(ol_flags & (PKT_TX_IP_CKSUM | PKT_TX_L4_MASK |
> PKT_TX_TCP_SEG)))
> > return 0;
>
> I think this test should be updated too with PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM.
>
Thanks. Yes, I'll update it too.
>
> >
> > - if (ol_flags & (PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 | PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6))
> > + if (ol_flags & (PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV4 | PKT_TX_OUTER_IPV6)) {
> > inner_l3_offset += m->outer_l2_len + m->outer_l3_len;
> > + /*
> > + * prepare outer ipv4 header checksum by setting it to 0,
> > + * in order to be computed by hardware NICs.
> > + */
> > + if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM) {
> > + ipv4_hdr = rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m,
> > + struct rte_ipv4_hdr *,
> m->outer_l2_len);
> > + ipv4_hdr->hdr_checksum = 0;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> What about outer L4 checksum? Does it requires the same than inner?
>
I am using XL710 for my testing with i40e dpdk driver. AFAIK, It doesn't
support outer l4 checksum. I am not sure if other Intel NICs support it.
> >
> > /*
> > * Check if headers are fragmented.
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-07 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-30 11:04 Mohsin Kazmi
2021-06-30 14:09 ` Olivier Matz
2021-07-07 9:14 ` Mohsin Kazmi [this message]
2021-07-22 19:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-08-03 12:29 ` Mohsin Kazmi
2021-07-07 9:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net: fix Intel-specific Prepare " Mohsin Kazmi
2021-07-22 19:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon
2021-07-27 12:52 ` Olivier Matz
2021-07-28 15:46 ` [dpdk-dev] " Andrew Rybchenko
2021-07-30 11:11 ` Olivier Matz
2021-07-31 12:49 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2021-08-03 12:49 ` Mohsin Kazmi
2021-08-27 13:44 ` Mohsin Kazmi
2021-09-07 10:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] net: fix Intel-specific Prepare the outer IPv4 " Mohsin Kazmi
2021-09-15 10:39 ` Ferruh Yigit
2021-09-15 11:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKkt9++9mJoUOsmVTfZwP-fS651RMyHvDdCHSJgE8om0pB+wzw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mohsin.kazmi14@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=ray.kinsella@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).