From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0494DA0558; Thu, 26 May 2022 23:40:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB6B40E50; Thu, 26 May 2022 23:40:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f45.google.com (mail-wm1-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CC740DF7 for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 23:40:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f45.google.com with SMTP id r126-20020a1c4484000000b00397345f2c6fso1561161wma.4 for ; Thu, 26 May 2022 14:40:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kuDIqvD/WI3Yy9Tpan0JYvxMpy39VYaRzEYTf299TBk=; b=nAJPmGJ526XCkmYNUWLt5+vJ0JpFZCGlADo1h07462lCX9Gm0gFhHgsfRzFjoiMVu7 vlf/KPARuYfuST2uLtY7AYcqpTbF1b2k5bBznHHFnD26bAMpg0OZSxPmLS9aQhclWzaD BgV/gkDQ2ZIDPYFdMdmaMn1SG5vB7gUgNHXfg2wDGFqNJEWxifl8xAWiER9CXAOIR8+/ f/7YmlFjCRlCI+u9+kR89omhKM86aUMRHxfjzhO6LihQ3NgogNQtOfXC6vCjqXzjcmPQ 4D3ja/huVTo5pYmMOkGq6vVUMjjaCz7H0ujmrNS3u8MSA/v6BeWRtYOb8hjWJioRNuz6 j/nQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kuDIqvD/WI3Yy9Tpan0JYvxMpy39VYaRzEYTf299TBk=; b=QhY9LA5EDZVYygrNmzDrZrW5qsrxIwUIbEWr5cGdOcnDb281lLXfipNIT7tVg4kRaw 2rG69oJN7LJOC5IOqP7As46EvhrOHvJXLDXU0UbTcw20EnvO+PnT06dthUtife5pUOLP D55mI6RsMOEOrpRPXVrrALJNFMy+d6O7jFRKlYgE/dYEP5bVEzDyEayEJMjXA3ErbuSg qnJyFbSsWTvCDm4RJuKCjlr050YgzI+YsdlhDxocitqjnILfd9D+wRseVXonu2dFj/qB B0HAZKc18JrtQHRcmoGKOPxXOEe4b8B6/7jWZeaPK/lp/uCyCFxF/XZ2Z2rdekt0VI+Z VlKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kXVU54dfTJzWUOkvTxd8Pn2jWJxMzaJmRV3fuk1fCgbnHYNG/ 4ZZnbMqlvVdzIMHILp+FTr97s9V332pq8lG5xnMN2yDVw9M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPO5ee6HvCCVMx/BuxP+ApZ8y+woF4bfVHxXVtfkH09/NEmaG0qFEhhWYpJvRt/ya3nGAt7ccR5gJAiydci2I= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:348c:b0:397:4f69:775f with SMTP id a12-20020a05600c348c00b003974f69775fmr4012646wmq.24.1653601200516; Thu, 26 May 2022 14:40:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ben Magistro Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 17:39:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Confirm if rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify should be experimental To: dev@dpdk.org, Olivier Matz Cc: ben.magistro@trinitycyber.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000028346005dff10837" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --00000000000028346005dff10837 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" This may simply be a docs and signature mismatch (or macro wasn't available at the time, didn't check that aspect) but the function rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify() is marked as experimental in the signature but not in the associated function comments (doxygen). Should this function be considered experimental and the docs section updated or is this considered a stable function and the signature should updated? Introduced in https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210630135158.8108-4-olivier.matz@6wind.com/ Thanks, Ben Magistro --00000000000028346005dff10837 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This may simply be a docs and signature mismatch (or macro= wasn't available at the time, didn't check that aspect) but the fu= nction rte_ipv4_udptcp_cksum_verify() is marked as experimental in the sign= ature but not in the associated function comments (doxygen).=C2=A0 Should t= his function be considered experimental and the docs section updated or is = this considered a stable function and the signature should updated?


--00000000000028346005dff10837--